» Articles » PMID: 31706330

The Best Treatment Option(s) for Adult and Elderly Patients with Chronic Primary Musculoskeletal Pain: a Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Syst Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Nov 11
PMID 31706330
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) is one subcategory of the new classification of chronic primary pain for the upcoming ICD-11, defined as chronic pain in the muscles, bones, joints, or tendons that persists or recurs for more than 3 months and is associated with significant emotional distress or functional disability. An array of pharmacological, psychological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions is available for CPMP, for which previous research has demonstrated varying effect sizes with regard to effectiveness in pain reduction and other main outcomes. This highlights the need for the synthesis of all available evidence. The proposed network meta-analysis will compare all available interventions for CPMP to determine the best treatment option(s) with a focus on efficacy and safety of interventions.

Methods: We are interested in comparing interventions of the following types: psychological, pharmacological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions. We will include all randomized controlled trials that compare one intervention with another, or with a control group, in the treatment of CPMP. Primary efficacy outcomes will be pain intensity, emotional distress, and functional disability. Safety outcomes extracted will include proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events, unwanted events, or drop-out rates due to side effects. Published and unpublished trials will be sought through the search of all relevant databases and trial registries. At least two independent reviewers of the team will select the references and extract data independently. We will assess the risk of bias of each individual study using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We will conduct a network meta-analysis to synthesize all evidence for each outcome. We will fit our model primarily within a Bayesian framework.

Discussion: CPMP is a disabling condition for which several interventions exist. To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis to systematically compare all available evidence. This is required by national health institutions to inform their decisions about the best available treatment option(s) with regard to efficacy and safety outcomes.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018096114.

Citing Articles

"But when I come home…": How patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain account for their absent pain during naturally occurring clinical consultations.

Andersen T, Lian O Qual Res Med Healthc. 2025; 8(3):12612.

PMID: 39906324 PMC: 11791474. DOI: 10.4081/qrmh.2024.12612.


Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice.

Koechlin H, Werdelis C, Barke A, Korwisi B, von Kanel R, Wagner J Pain Rep. 2024; 10(1):e1216.

PMID: 39664707 PMC: 11630933. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001216.


Rehabilitation interventions for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Backryd E, Ghafouri N, Gerdle B, Dragioti E J Rehabil Med. 2024; 56():jrm40188.

PMID: 39101676 PMC: 11318642. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40188.


The changes of blood-based inflammatory biomarkers after non-pharmacologic interventions for chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Puerto Valencia L, He Y, Wippert P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):209.

PMID: 38459458 PMC: 10921684. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07289-1.


Editorial: Highlights in musculoskeletal pain 2021/22.

Xu X Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023; 4:1139627.

PMID: 36824314 PMC: 9941659. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1139627.


References
1.
Beck A, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, ERBAUGH J . An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:561-71. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. View

2.
Kamper S, Apeldoorn A, Chiarotto A, Smeets R, Ostelo R, Guzman J . Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015; 350:h444. PMC: 4353283. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h444. View

3.
Mills S, Torrance N, Smith B . Identification and Management of Chronic Pain in Primary Care: a Review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016; 18(2):22. PMC: 4731442. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-015-0659-9. View

4.
Turner E, Matthews A, Linardatos E, Tell R, Rosenthal R . Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(3):252-60. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa065779. View

5.
Furukawa T, Salanti G, Atkinson L, Leucht S, Ruhe H, Turner E . Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-generation and second-generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depression: protocol for a network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(7):e010919. PMC: 4947714. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010919. View