» Articles » PMID: 31705382

An Adaptive Algorithm for Fast and Reliable Online Saccade Detection

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2019 Nov 10
PMID 31705382
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate visual perception around the time of eye movements, vision scientists manipulate stimuli contingent upon the onset of a saccade. For these experimental paradigms, timing is especially crucial, because saccade offset imposes a deadline on the display change. Although efficient online saccade detection can greatly improve timing, most algorithms rely on spatial-boundary techniques or absolute-velocity thresholds, which both suffer from weaknesses: late detections and false alarms, respectively. We propose an adaptive, velocity-based algorithm for online saccade detection that surpasses both standard techniques in speed and accuracy and allows the user to freely define the detection criteria. Inspired by the Engbert-Kliegl algorithm for microsaccade detection, our algorithm computes two-dimensional velocity thresholds from variance in the preceding fixation samples, while compensating for noisy or missing data samples. An optional direction criterion limits detection to the instructed saccade direction, further increasing robustness. We validated the algorithm by simulating its performance on a large saccade dataset and found that high detection accuracy (false-alarm rates of < 1%) could be achieved with detection latencies of only 3 ms. High accuracy was maintained even under simulated high-noise conditions. To demonstrate that purely intrasaccadic presentations are technically feasible, we devised an experimental test in which a Gabor patch drifted at saccadic peak velocities. Whereas this stimulus was invisible when presented during fixation, observers reliably detected it during saccades. Photodiode measurements verified that-including all system delays-the stimuli were physically displayed on average 20 ms after saccade onset. Thus, the proposed algorithm provides a valuable tool for gaze-contingent paradigms.

Citing Articles

The fundamentals of eye tracking part 3: How to choose an eye tracker.

Nystrom M, Hooge I, Hessels R, Andersson R, Hansen D, Johansson R Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):67.

PMID: 39843609 PMC: 11754381. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02587-x.


The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.

Niehorster D, Nystrom M, Hessels R, Andersson R, Benjamins J, Hansen D Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):46.

PMID: 39762687 PMC: 11703944. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.


Eye movement function captured via an electronic tablet informs on cognition and disease severity in Parkinson's disease.

Koch N, Voss P, Cisneros-Franco J, Drouin-Picaro A, Tounkara F, Ducharme S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9082.

PMID: 38643273 PMC: 11032372. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59750-9.


ACE-DNV: Automatic classification of gaze events in dynamic natural viewing.

Nejad A, de Haan G, Heutink J, Cornelissen F Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(4):3300-3314.

PMID: 38448726 PMC: 11133063. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02358-8.


Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.

Gonzalez-Vides L, Hernandez-Verdejo J, Canadas-Suarez P J Eye Mov Res. 2023; 16(3).

PMID: 38111688 PMC: 10725735. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.16.3.3.