» Articles » PMID: 31705331

Inflammatory Serum Markers Predicting Spontaneous Ureteral Stone Passage

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2019 Nov 10
PMID 31705331
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral stones pose a high economic and medical burden among Emergency Department (ED) admissions. Management strategies vary from expectant therapy to surgical interventions. However, predictors of spontaneous ureteral stone passage are still not well understood. We aim to explore the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios in the spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP).

Methods: Chart review was done for 619 patients who presented to our institution's ED with non-febrile renal colic and received a radiological diagnosis of ureteral stone of less than 10 mm. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data were collected. The Linear-by-Linear Association test was used to look at the trend among the NLR and PLR quartiles and other demographic variables. Univariate analysis was run for the collected variables. Then, a hierarchal backward multivariate logistic regression was run for each of NLR and PLR variables. To validate the results, bootstrapping was undertaken for each model.

Results: NLR between 2.87 and 4.87 had odds ratio (OR) 2.96 (95% CI 1.80-5.49) and an NLR > 4.87 had 3.63 (2.04-6.69) the odds of retained ureteral stone. A PLR between 10.42 and 15.25 and a PLR > 15.25 had 3.28 (1.79-6.19) and 3.84 (2.28-7.12) the odds of failed SSP, respectively. Other significant variables in the two models are diabetes, urine leukocyte esterase > 10 white blood cell/μl, moderate-to-severe hydronephrosis, and stone size.

Conclusion: NLR and PLR are inversely associated with SSP of ureteral stones. In adjunct with other indicators, NLR and PLR are inflammatory markers that could be used in the clinical decision of ureteral stone management.

Citing Articles

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in urolithiasis: a systematic review.

Khanzadeh S, Zarimeidani F, Kashani E, Babadi S, Rahmati R, Lucke-Wold B BMC Urol. 2025; 25(1):51.

PMID: 40082846 PMC: 11905559. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-025-01720-y.


The application of new type ureteroscope and traditional linear ureteroscope in ureteric stone patients.

Tong X, Chen M, Wang X, Han W, Zhang D, Xiao J BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):285.

PMID: 39725913 PMC: 11673702. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01678-3.


Association between the systemic inflammation response index and kidney stones in US adults: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007-2018.

Zhang Z, Wang G, Dai X, Li W Urolithiasis. 2024; 52(1):165.

PMID: 39570426 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01668-y.


The relationship between complete blood cell count-derived inflammatory biomarkers and benign prostatic hyperplasia in middle-aged and elderly individuals in the United States: Evidence from NHANES 2001-2008.

Shi C, Cao H, Zeng G, Yang L, Wang Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306860.

PMID: 38980876 PMC: 11233019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306860.


Predictive value of inflammatory markers for the spontaneous passage of Ureteral stones: a comprehensive systematic review with meta analysis.

Bapir R, Fakhralddin S, Aghaways I, Muhammed B, Rahim H, Fattah F Urolithiasis. 2024; 52(1):98.

PMID: 38907797 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01590-3.


References
1.
Pearle M, Calhoun E, Curhan G . Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005; 173(3):848-57. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7. View

2.
Yamaguchi K, Minei S, Yamazaki T, Kaya H, Okada K . Characterization of ureteral lesions associated with impacted stones. Int J Urol. 1999; 6(6):281-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.1999.00067.x. View

3.
Saenz Medina J, Alarcon Parra R, Redondo Gonzalez E, Llanes Gonzalez L, Crespo Martinez L, Fernandez Montarroso L . [Prognostic factors of spontaneous expulsion in ureteral lithiasis]. Actas Urol Esp. 2010; 34(10):882-7. View

4.
Skolarikos A, Laguna M, Alivizatos G, Kural A, de la Rosette J . The role for active monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2010; 24(6):923-30. DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0670. View

5.
Hess B . [Pathophysiology, diagnosis and conservative therapy in calcium kidney calculi]. Ther Umsch. 2003; 60(2):79-87. DOI: 10.1024/0040-5930.60.2.79. View