» Articles » PMID: 31705196

Brain Structure Differences Between Solitary And social Wasp species Are Independent of Body Size Allometry

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Nov 10
PMID 31705196
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evolutionary transitions in social behavior are often associated with changes in species' brain architecture. A recent comparative analysis showed that the structure of brains of wasps in the family Vespidae differed between solitary and social species: the mushroom bodies, a major integrative brain region, were larger relative to brain size in the solitary species. However, the earlier study did not account for body size effects, and species' relative mushroom body size increases with body size in social Vespidae. Here we extend the previous analysis by measuring the effects of body size variation on brain structure differences between social and solitary vespid wasps. We asked whether total brain volume was greater relative to body size in the solitary species, and whether relative mushroom body size was greater in solitary species, after accounting for body size effects. Both total brain volume and relative mushroom body volume were significantly greater in the solitary species after accounting for body size differences. Therefore, body size allometry did not explain the solitary versus social species differences in brain structure. The evolutionary transition from solitary to social behavior in Vespidae was accompanied by decreases in total brain size and in relative mushroom body size.

Citing Articles

Social Brain Energetics: Ergonomic Efficiency, Neurometabolic Scaling, and Metabolic Polyphenism in Ants.

Coto Z, Traniello J Integr Comp Biol. 2022; .

PMID: 35617153 PMC: 9825342. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icac048.


Feeding specialization and longer generation time are associated with relatively larger brains in bees.

Sayol F, Collado M, Garcia-Porta J, Seid M, Gibbs J, Agorreta A Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1935):20200762.

PMID: 32933447 PMC: 7542820. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0762.

References
1.
Godfrey R, Gronenberg W . Brain evolution in social insects: advocating for the comparative approach. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2019; 205(1):13-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-019-01315-7. View

2.
Hager R, Lu L, Rosen G, Williams R . Genetic architecture supports mosaic brain evolution and independent brain-body size regulation. Nat Commun. 2012; 3:1079. PMC: 4267555. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2086. View

3.
DeCasien A, Williams S, Higham J . Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 1(5):112. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0112. View

4.
Lihoreau M, Latty T, Chittka L . An exploration of the social brain hypothesis in insects. Front Physiol. 2012; 3:442. PMC: 3506958. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00442. View

5.
Dunbar R, Shultz S . Evolution in the social brain. Science. 2007; 317(5843):1344-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1145463. View