Optic Flow and Attention Alter Locomotion Differently in the Young and Old
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Optic flow is used in the control of walking speed and aids in navigation through space. However, the influence of attention on optic flow processing during locomotion is not known.
Research Question: Does attentional focus influence the processing of optic flow during locomotion in young and older adults?
Methods: Auditory and visual concurrent reaction time tasks were conducted while walking on a treadmill within an anterior-posterior modulating optic flow field in young and older adults. Optic flow was generated with full field back-projected scenes shown while walking on a treadmill under three conditions: a) optic flow consistent with the treadmill speed, b) slow sinusoidal modulation of the speed (SINE), and c) reversals of optic flow velocity from congruent with walking to the opposite direction (REV). Movement in response to the scenes along with reaction times were measured.
Results: The optic flow perturbations altered movement on the treadmill. Older adults responded more than young adults during the slowly changing sinusoidal perturbations, but not to the rapid reversing scenes. Our main hypothesis that sensory modality of a concurrent cognitive task influences the processing of optic flow was confirmed for the reversing optic flow condition but not for the sinusoidal optic flow. The impact of optic flow conditions on reaction times was only found during the REV condition, with impact on visual RTs being greater than auditory RTs.
Significance: Taken together, the results suggest attentional focus on sensory modality of concurrent tasks while walking can impact optic flow processing for navigation and control; however, the characteristics of the optic flow (e.g. perturbation speed) play an important role.
Tashiro T, Maeda N, Abekura T, Mizuta R, Terao Y, Arima S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(9).
PMID: 38732825 PMC: 11085622. DOI: 10.3390/s24092718.
Sensory Input Modulates Microsaccades during Heading Perception.
Raffi M, Trofe A, Perazzolo M, Meoni A, Piras A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(6).
PMID: 33799672 PMC: 8000400. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18062865.