» Articles » PMID: 31703258

Agonistic Interactions in Pigs-Comparison of Dominance Indices with Parameters Derived from Social Network Analysis in Three Age Groups

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Nov 10
PMID 31703258
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dominance indices are often calculated using the number of won and lost fights of each animal focusing on dyadic interactions. Social network analysis provides new insights into the establishment of stable group structures going beyond the dyadic approach. Thus, it was investigated whether centrality parameters describing the importance of each animal for the network are able to capture the rank order calculated by dominance indices. Therefore, two dominance indices and five centrality parameters based on two network types (initiator-receiver and winner-loser networks) were calculated regarding agonistic interactions observed in three mixing events (weaned piglets, fattening pigs, gilts). Comparing the two network types, the winner-loser networks demonstrated highly positive correlation coefficients between out-degree and outgoing closeness and the dominance indices. These results were confirmed by partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM), i.e., about 60% of the variance of the dominance could be explained by the centrality parameters, whereby the winner-loser networks could better illustrate the dominance hierarchy with path coefficients of about 1.1 for all age groups. Thus, centrality parameters can portray the dominance hierarchy providing more detailed insights into group structure which goes beyond the dyadic approach.

Citing Articles

Evaluating social network metrics as indicators of tail injury caused by tail biting in growing-finishing pigs ().

St Charles K, VanderWaal K, Anderson J, Johnston L, Li Y Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1441813.

PMID: 39397809 PMC: 11466945. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1441813.


When the neighbors are noisy: effect of social challenge in collateral pens of stressed animals.

Guevara R, Lopez-Verge S, Pastor J, Manteca X, Tedo G, Llonch P Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1433628.

PMID: 39376919 PMC: 11457045. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1433628.


Systematic review of animal-based indicators to measure thermal, social, and immune-related stress in pigs.

Guevara R, Pastor J, Manteca X, Tedo G, Llonch P PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0266524.

PMID: 35511825 PMC: 9070874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266524.


Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.

Jezovit J, Alwash N, Levine J Front Neural Circuits. 2021; 15:755093.

PMID: 34924963 PMC: 8683092. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2021.755093.


Social Network Analysis in Farm Animals: Sensor-Based Approaches.

Neethirajan S, Kemp B Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(2).

PMID: 33567488 PMC: 7914829. DOI: 10.3390/ani11020434.


References
1.
Buttner K, Scheffler K, Czycholl I, Krieter J . Social network analysis - centrality parameters and individual network positions of agonistic behavior in pigs over three different age levels. Springerplus. 2015; 4:185. PMC: 4409614. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-0963-1. View

2.
Hessing M, Hagelso A, Schouten W, Wiepkema P, van Beek J . Individual behavioral and physiological strategies in pigs. Physiol Behav. 1994; 55(1):39-46. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90007-8. View

3.
Sabidussi G . The centrality of a graph. Psychometrika. 1966; 31(4):581-603. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289527. View

4.
Friend T, Knabe D, Tanksley Jr T . Behavior and performance of pigs grouped by three different methods at weaning. J Anim Sci. 1983; 57(6):1406-11. DOI: 10.2527/jas1983.5761406x. View

5.
Foister S, Doeschl-Wilson A, Roehe R, Arnott G, Boyle L, Turner S . Social network properties predict chronic aggression in commercial pig systems. PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0205122. PMC: 6171926. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205122. View