» Articles » PMID: 31696391

Zero-heat-flux Core Temperature Monitoring System: an Observational Secondary Analysis to Evaluate Agreement with Naso-/oropharyngeal Probe During Anesthesia

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Nov 8
PMID 31696391
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

General anesthesia impairs thermoregulation and contributes to perioperative hypothermia; core body temperature monitoring is recommended during surgical procedures lasting > 30 min. Zero-heat-flux core body temperature measurement systems enable continuous non-invasive perioperative monitoring. During a previous trial evaluating the benefits of preoperative forced-air warming, intraoperative temperatures were measured with both a zero-heat-flux sensor and a standard naso-/oropharyngeal temperature probe. The aim of this secondary analysis is to evaluate their agreement. ASA I-III patients, scheduled for elective, non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia, were enrolled. A zero-heat-flux sensor was placed on the participant's forehead preoperatively. Following induction of anesthesia, a "clinical" temperature probe was placed in the nasopharynx or oropharynx at the anesthesiologist's discretion. Temperature measurements from both sensors were recorded every 10 s. Agreement was analyzed using the Bland-Altman method, corrected for repeated measurements, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, and compared with existing studies. Data were collected in 194 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 60 (49-69) years, during surgical procedures lasting 120 (89-185) min. The zero-heat-flux measurements had a mean bias of - 0.05 °C (zero-heat-flux lower) with 95% limits of agreement within - 0.68 to + 0.58 °C. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.823. The zero-heat-flux sensor demonstrated moderate agreement with the naso-/oropharyngeal temperature probe, which was not fully within the generally accepted ± 0.5 °C limit. This is consistent with previous studies. The zero-heat-flux system offers clinical utility for non-invasive and continuous core body temperature monitoring throughout the perioperative period using a single sensor.

Citing Articles

Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates nasopharyngeal temperature by 0.39 °C: an observational study in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery.

Brandes I, Tirilomis T, Nemeth M, Wieditz J, Brauer A J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 39(1):205-215.

PMID: 39127818 PMC: 11821722. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01204-8.


Thermal mapping: Assessing the optimal sites for temperature measurement in the human body and emerging technologies.

Yu L, Delgado J, De Mezerville R Physiol Rep. 2024; 12(14):e16155.

PMID: 39039617 PMC: 11262999. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.16155.


Verification of an intravenous fluid warmer: A prospective, two-center observational trial.

Lax M, Mustola S, Repo K, Jarvinen J, Bayoro D, Cataldo S SAGE Open Med. 2023; 11:20503121231182517.

PMID: 37576564 PMC: 10413888. DOI: 10.1177/20503121231182517.


Zero-heat-flux thermometry over the carotid artery in assessment of core temperature in craniotomy patients.

Silvasti-Lundell M, Makkonen O, Kivisaari R, Luostarinen T, Pesonen E, Makinen M J Clin Monit Comput. 2023; 37(5):1153-1159.

PMID: 36879085 PMC: 10520089. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-023-00984-9.


Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study.

Munday J, Sturgess D, Oishi S, Bendeich J, Kearney A, Douglas C Patient Saf Surg. 2022; 16(1):32.

PMID: 36153550 PMC: 9509652. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-022-00341-w.


References
1.
Pawley M, Martinsen P, Mitchell S, Cheeseman J, Merry A, Willcox T . Brachial arterial temperature as an indicator of core temperature: proof of concept and potential applications. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013; 45(2):86-93. PMC: 4557585. View

2.
Pesonen E, Silvasti-Lundell M, Niemi T, Kivisaari R, Hernesniemi J, Makinen M . The focus of temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technology (3M Bair-Hugger): a clinical study with patients undergoing craniotomy. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018; 33(5):917-923. PMC: 6710334. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0227-z. View

3.
Jack J, Ellicott H, Jones C, Bremner S, Densham I, Harper C . Determining the accuracy of zero-flux and ingestible thermometers in the peri-operative setting. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019; 33(6):1113-1118. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00252-9. View

4.
Carvalho H, Najafi N, Poelaert J . Intra-operative temperature monitoring with cutaneous zero-heat- flux-thermometry in comparison with oesophageal temperature: A prospective study in the paediatric population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019; 29(8):865-871. DOI: 10.1111/pan.13653. View