» Articles » PMID: 31687938

Usability Factors Associated With Physicians' Distress and Information System-Related Stress: Cross-Sectional Survey

Overview
Journal JMIR Med Inform
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2019 Nov 6
PMID 31687938
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Constantly changing and difficult-to-use information systems have arisen as a significant source of stress in physicians' work. Physicians have reported several usability problems, system failures, and a lack of integration between the systems and have experienced that systems poorly support the documentation and retrieval of patient data. This stress has kept rising in the 21st century, and it seems that it may also affect physicians' well-being.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the associations of (1) usability variables (perceived benefits, technical problems, support for feedback, and user-friendliness), (2) the number of systems in daily use, (3) experience of using information systems, and (4) participation in information systems development work with physicians' distress and levels of stress related to information systems (SRIS) levels.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 4018 Finnish physicians (64.82%, 2572 out of 3968 women) aged between 24 and 64 years (mean 46.8 years) in 2017. The analyses of covariance were used to examine the association of independent variables with SRIS and distress (using the General Health Questionnaire) adjusted for age, gender, employment sector, specialization status, and the electronic health record system in use.

Results: High levels of technical problems and a high number of systems in daily use were associated with high levels of SRIS, whereas high levels of user-friendliness, perceived benefits, and support for feedback were associated with low levels of SRIS. Moreover, high levels of technical problems were associated with high levels of psychological distress, whereas high levels of user-friendliness were associated with low distress levels. Those who considered themselves experienced users of information systems had low levels of both SRIS and distress.

Conclusions: It seems that by investing in user-friendly systems with better technical quality and good support for feedback that professionals perceive as being beneficial would improve the work-related well-being and overall well-being of physicians. Moreover, improving physicians' skills related to information systems by giving them training could help to lessen the stress that results from poorly functioning information systems and improve physicians' well-being.

Citing Articles

Organisational-level risk and health-promoting factors within the healthcare sector-a systematic search and review.

Akerstrom M, Wahlstrom J, Lindegard A, Arvidsson I, Fagerlind Stahl A Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11:1509023.

PMID: 39895820 PMC: 11783186. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1509023.


Impact of Digitalization in Dentistry on Technostress, Mental Health, and Job Satisfaction: A Quantitative Study.

Bernburg M, Gebhardt J, Groneberg D, Mache S Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39791679 PMC: 11719768. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010072.


Factors Contributing to Successful Information System Implementation and Employee Well-Being in Health Care and Social Welfare Professionals: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Nadav J, Kaihlanen A, Kujala S, Keskimaki I, Viitanen J, Salovaara S JMIR Med Inform. 2024; 12:e52817.

PMID: 39570585 PMC: 11604090. DOI: 10.2196/52817.


Digital stressors and resources perceived by emergency physicians and associations to their digital stress perception, mental health, job satisfaction and work engagement.

Bernburg M, Tell A, Groneberg D, Mache S BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):31.

PMID: 38413900 PMC: 10900642. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-00950-x.


Associations of perceived changes in work due to digitalization and the amount of digital work with job strain among physicians: a national representative sample.

Virtanen L, Kaihlanen A, Saukkonen P, Reponen J, Laaveri T, Vehko T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023; 23(1):252.

PMID: 37940995 PMC: 10631156. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02351-9.


References
1.
Penninkilampi-Kerola V, Miettunen J, Ebeling H . A comparative assessment of the factor structures and psychometric properties of the GHQ-12 and the GHQ-20 based on data from a Finnish population-based sample. Scand J Psychol. 2006; 47(5):431-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00551.x. View

2.
Heponiemi T, Aalto A, Pekkarinen L, Siuvatti E, Elovainio M . Are there high-risk groups among physicians that are more vulnerable to on-call work?. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33(5):614-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.01.034. View

3.
Kuo K, Liu C, Talley P, Pan S . Strategic Improvement for Quality and Satisfaction of Hospital Information Systems. J Healthc Eng. 2018; 2018:3689618. PMC: 6157169. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3689618. View

4.
Kroth P, Morioka-Douglas N, Veres S, Babbott S, Poplau S, Qeadan F . Association of Electronic Health Record Design and Use Factors With Clinician Stress and Burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(8):e199609. PMC: 6704736. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9609. View

5.
Heponiemi T, Aalto A, Puttonen S, Vanska J, Elovainio M . Work-related stress, job resources, and well-being among psychiatrists and other medical specialists in Finland. Psychiatr Serv. 2014; 65(6):796-801. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300200. View