» Articles » PMID: 31679537

Well-being and Mental Health Interventions for Indigenous People in Prison: Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BJPsych Open
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Nov 5
PMID 31679537
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Indigenous people are overrepresented in prison populations of colonised justice systems, and Indigenous prisoners in these countries are at a particularly high risk of poor mental health and well-being. There is an acute need to ensure the access of these groups to culturally appropriate, evidence-based interventions.

Aims: To conduct a systematic review, evaluating quantitative and qualitative evaluations of mental health and well-being interventions designed for Indigenous people in custody.

Method: A search of relevant peer-reviewed journal articles to August 2019 was conducted. The focus was on colonised countries under a Western model of justice and health, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the USA. The review utilised Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycNET, EBSCO, Proquest Criminal Justice Database and Informit.

Results: Of the 9283 articles initially found, only three quantitative and two qualitative evaluations of mental health or well-being interventions for Indigenous people in custody were identified. None were randomised controlled trials. Culturally based interventions appeared to have high acceptability and potential for increased recovery from trauma, reduced alcohol-related problems and lower reoffending. However, no studies quantitatively assessed mental health or well-being outcomes.

Conclusions: As yet there is no high-quality evidence on the impact on mental health and well-being from interventions specifically for Indigenous prisoners, although existing studies suggest programme features that may maximise acceptability and impact. There is a moral, social and practical imperative to build a strong evidence base on this topic.

Citing Articles

The Use of a Digital Well-Being App (Stay Strong App) With Indigenous People in Prison: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Perdacher E, Kavanagh D, Sheffield J, Dale P, Heffernan E JMIR Ment Health. 2024; 11:e53280.

PMID: 39642362 PMC: 11662183. DOI: 10.2196/53280.


The mental wellbeing of female prisoners in Chile.

Aboaja A, Blackwood D, Alvarado R, Grant L BMC Res Notes. 2023; 16(1):78.

PMID: 37189158 PMC: 10186625. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06342-x.


First Nations Peoples in the forensic mental health system in New South Wales: Characteristics and rates of criminal charges post-release.

Dean K, Lyons G, Johnson A, McEntyre E Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023; 57(6):904-913.

PMID: 36786199 PMC: 10201079. DOI: 10.1177/00048674231151594.


Using the Stay Strong App for the Well-being of Indigenous Australian Prisoners: Feasibility Study.

Perdacher E, Kavanagh D, Sheffield J, Healy K, Dale P, Heffernan E JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(4):e32157.

PMID: 35394444 PMC: 9034424. DOI: 10.2196/32157.

References
1.
Hoing M, Bogaerts S, Vogelvang B . Helping Sex Offenders to Desist Offending: The Gains and Drains for CoSA Volunteers-A Review of the Literature. Sex Abuse. 2014; 28(5):364-402. DOI: 10.1177/1079063214535816. View

2.
Hinton R, Kavanagh D, Barclay L, Chenhall R, Nagel T . Developing a best practice pathway to support improvements in Indigenous Australians' mental health and well-being: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(8):e007938. PMC: 4554908. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007938. View

3.
Durie M . Indigenous health: New Zealand experience. Med J Aust. 2012; 197(1):10-1. DOI: 10.5694/mja12.10719. View

4.
Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles C, Hagen N, Biondo P, Cummings G . Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 18(1):12-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x. View

5.
Griner D, Smith T . Culturally adapted mental health intervention: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011; 43(4):531-48. DOI: 10.1037/0033-3204.43.4.531. View