» Articles » PMID: 31676645

Prototyping for Public Health in a Local Context: a Streamlined Evaluation of a Community-based Weight Management Programme (Momenta), Northumberland, UK

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Nov 3
PMID 31676645
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Stakeholder co-production in design of public health programmes may reduce the 'implementation gap' but can be time-consuming and costly. Prototyping, iterative refining relevant to delivery context, offers a potential solution. This evaluation explored implementation and lessons learnt for a 12-week referral-based weight-management programme, 'Momenta', along with feasibility of an iterative prototyping evaluation framework.

Design: Mixed methods evaluation: Qualitative implementation exploration with referrers and service users; preliminary analysis of anonymised quantitative service data (12 and 52 weeks).

Setting: Two leisure centres in Northumberland, North East England.

Participants: Individual interviews with referring professionals (n=5) and focus groups with service users (n=13). Individuals (n=182) referred by healthcare professionals (quantitative data).

Interventions: Three 12-week programme iterations: Momenta (n=59), Momenta-Fitness membership (n=58) and Fitness membership only (n=65).

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Primary outcome: Qualitative themes developed through stakeholder-engagement. Secondary outcomes included preliminary exploration of recruitment, uptake, retention, and changes in weight, body mass index, waist circumference and psychological well-being.

Results: Service users reported positive experiences of Momenta. Implementation gaps were revealed around the referral process and practitioner knowledge. Prototyping enabled iterative refinements such as broadening inclusion criteria. Uptake and 12-week retention were higher for Momenta (84.7%, 45.8%) and Momenta-Fitness (93.1%, 60.3%) versus Fitness only (75.4%, 24.6%). Exploration of other preliminary outcomes (completers only) suggested potential for within-group weight loss and increased psychological well-being for Momenta and Momenta-Fitness at 12 weeks. 52 week follow-up data were limited (32%, 33% and 6% retention for those who started Momenta, Momenta-Fitness and Fitness, respectively) but suggested potential weight loss maintenance for Momenta-Fitness.

Conclusions: Identification of issues within the referral process enabled real-time iterative refinement, while lessons learnt may be of value for local implementation of 'off-the-shelf' weight management packages more generally. Our preliminary data for completers suggest Momenta may have potential for weight loss, particularly when offered with a fitness membership.

Citing Articles

Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics.

Marsilio M, Fusco F, Gheduzzi E, Guglielmetti C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(7).

PMID: 33804862 PMC: 8037812. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073336.


Addressing Obesity to Promote Healthy Aging.

Roderka M, Puri S, Batsis J Clin Geriatr Med. 2020; 36(4):631-643.

PMID: 33010899 PMC: 7533351. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2020.06.006.


The Northumberland Exercise Referral Scheme as a Universal Community Weight Management Programme: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Outcomes, Expectations and Experiences across a Social Gradient.

Dodd-Reynolds C, Vallis D, Kasim A, Akhter N, Hanson C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(15).

PMID: 32717836 PMC: 7432420. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155297.

References
1.
Ahern A, Aveyard P, Boyland E, Halford J, Jebb S . Inequalities in the uptake of weight management interventions in a pragmatic trial: an observational study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66(645):e258-63. PMC: 4809709. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684337. View

2.
Mastellos N, Gunn L, Felix L, Car J, Majeed A . Transtheoretical model stages of change for dietary and physical exercise modification in weight loss management for overweight and obese adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (2):CD008066. PMC: 10088065. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008066.pub3. View

3.
Kilbourne A, Neumann M, Pincus H, Bauer M, Stall R . Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci. 2007; 2:42. PMC: 2248206. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-42. View

4.
Bhaskaran K, Douglas I, Forbes H, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Leon D, Smeeth L . Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5·24 million UK adults. Lancet. 2014; 384(9945):755-65. PMC: 4151483. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60892-8. View

5.
Adams J, Mytton O, White M, Monsivais P . Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(4):e1001990. PMC: 4821622. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990. View