» Articles » PMID: 31672220

Impact and Predictors of Positive Response to Desensitization in Pediatric Heart Transplant Candidates

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Desensitization, the process of reducing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT), has unclear efficacy in pediatric HT candidates.

Methods: Pediatric HT candidates listed at our institution between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitization was defined as the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 10% with ≥ 1 a strong positive antibody. The desensitization response was defined as a ≥ 25% reduction in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for ≥ 90% of the strong positive antibodies on follow-up panel reactive antibody (PRA) testing before waitlist removal, HT, or death (data available for 13 patients).

Results: The HT candidates were categorized as sensitized receiving desensitization therapy (ST, n = 14), sensitized not receiving therapy (SNT, n = 18), or non-sensitized (n = 55). A desensitization response was observed in 8 (62%) of the ST upon repeat PRA testing, with the ST responders receiving more doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (8 vs 2, p < 0.05). The anti-HLA class I antibodies were particularly resistant for non-responders (p = 1.9 × 10). The combination of homograft and ventricular assist device was more sensitizing than either alone (p = 3.1 × 10). However, these sensitization risk factors did not impact the desensitization response. The ST was associated with a higher likelihood of remaining listed and a longer waitlist time without substantially impacting the HT rate, waitlist mortality, or early post-HT outcomes.

Conclusions: Most ST patients had a favorable response to desensitization, with a dose-dependent response observed for IVIG. The anti-HLA class likely impacts the ST response, whereas traditional sensitization risk factors had no impact on the response.

Citing Articles

Novel Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Konda P, Golamari R, Eisen H Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022; 272:267-285.

PMID: 35318509 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_569.


Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation.

Habal M Front Immunol. 2021; 12:702186.

PMID: 34504489 PMC: 8423343. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.702186.

References
1.
Mahle W, Tresler M, Edens R, Rusconi P, George J, Naftel D . Allosensitization and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011; 30(11):1221-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.06.005. View

2.
Kimball P, Owens A, Gibney E . Quantitation of alloantibody concentration can predict patient sensitivity to intravenous immunoglobulin desensitization. Transplantation. 2007; 84(11):1540-3. DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000291702.00941.3f. View

3.
Schumacher K, Ramon D, Kamoun M, Caruthers R, Gajarski R . HLA desensitization in pediatric heart transplant candidates: efficacy of rituximab and IVIg. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012; 31(9):1041-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.05.009. View

4.
Zeevi A, Lunz J, Feingold B, Shullo M, Bermudez C, Teuteberg J . Persistent strong anti-HLA antibody at high titer is complement binding and associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012; 32(1):98-105. PMC: 3628631. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.09.021. View

5.
Feingold B, Park S, Comer D, Bryce C, Webber S . Listing requirements for a prospective crossmatch in pediatric heart transplantation: analysis of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from 1996 to 2009. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012; 31(10):1143-4. PMC: 4459722. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.006. View