» Articles » PMID: 31668714

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Delay in Radical Cystectomy and the Effect on Survival in Bladder Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Eur Urol Oncol
Specialties Oncology
Urology
Date 2019 Nov 1
PMID 31668714
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: The complexity of bladder cancer diagnosis and staging results in delays in definitive treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer by radical cystectomy.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analyses aim to assess the impact of delays in radical cystectomy.

Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review was conducted by searching Medline and Ovid Gateway using protocol-driven search terms in August 2019, with no time limit on the studies included. The identified studies were assessed according to strict criteria and using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analyses were conducted based on the type of delay. Random-effect models were used whereby the presence of a delay was the exposure variable and overall survival was the outcome of interest, for which pooled hazard ratios were calculated.

Evidence Synthesis: Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion (17 532 patients), of which 10 were included in the meta-analyses. A longer delay between bladder cancer diagnosis and radical cystectomy resulted in a pooled hazard ratio of 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.53) for overall death. For a delay between transurethral resection and cystectomy, we found a pooled hazard ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.99-1.41) for overall death. A pooled hazard ratio of 1.04 (95% CI: 0.93-1.16) was calculated for a longer delay between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy.

Conclusions: A delay in radical cystectomy after diagnosis was found to have a significantly detrimental effect on overall survival for bladder cancer patients. However, there was huge heterogeneity in how a delay was defined.

Patient Summary: In this review, we investigated the effect of a delay in radical treatment on survival. This review highlights the importance of scheduling radical cystectomies in a timely manner whilst monitoring factors such as comorbidities and scheduling, in order to treat patients requiring radical cystectomy without delay.

Citing Articles

Metastasis development in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Leyderman M, Chandrasekar T, Grivas P, Li R, Bhat S, Basnet A Nat Rev Urol. 2024; .

PMID: 39567681 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00963-y.


National audit of patient reported experience of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer pathways.

Kuppanda P, Hermans L, Uren A, Cotterill N, Rowe E, Narahari K BJUI Compass. 2024; 5(10):961-968.

PMID: 39416758 PMC: 11479807. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.422.


Image directed redesign of bladder cancer treatment pathways: the BladderPath RCT.

James N, Pirrie S, Liu W, Catto J, Jefferson K, Patel P Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(42):1-65.

PMID: 39246267 PMC: 11403381. DOI: 10.3310/DEHT5407.


Can We Go beyond Pathology? The Prognostic Role of Risk Scoring Tools for Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients with Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

Slusarczyk A, Wolanski R, Milow J, Piekarczyk H, Lipinski P, Zapala P Biomedicines. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39062114 PMC: 11275140. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12071541.


OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: SINGLE CENTER RESULTS AND OUTCOMES IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS.

cikic B, Zekulic T, Penezic L, Andelic J, Kulis T, Saic H Acta Clin Croat. 2024; 62(Suppl2):21-27.

PMID: 38966027 PMC: 11221229. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.3.