» Articles » PMID: 31664893

Impact of Merging Commercial Breeding Lines on the Genetic Diversity of Landrace Pigs

Overview
Journal Genet Sel Evol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2019 Oct 31
PMID 31664893
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The pig breeding industry has undergone a large number of mergers in the past decades. Various commercial lines were merged or discontinued, which is expected to reduce the genetic diversity of the pig species. The objective of the current study was to investigate the genetic diversity of different former Dutch Landrace breeding lines and quantify their relationship with the current Dutch Landrace breed that originated from these lines.

Results: Principal component analysis clearly divided the former Landrace lines into two main clusters, which are represented by Norwegian/Finnish Landrace lines and Dutch Landrace lines. Structure analysis revealed that each of the lines that are present in the Dutch Gene bank has a unique genetic identity. The current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former lines. The Dumeco N-line, which is conserved in the Dutch Gene bank, is poorly represented in the current Dutch Landrace. All seven lines (the six former and the current line) contribute almost equally to the genetic diversity of the Dutch Landrace breed. As expected, the current Dutch Landrace breed comprises only a small proportion of unique genetic diversity that was not present in the other lines. The genetic diversity level, as measured by Eding's core set method, was equal to 0.89 for the current Dutch Landrace breed, whereas total genetic diversity across the seven lines, measured by the same method, was equal to 0.99.

Conclusions: The current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former Dutch Landrace lines. Merging of commercial Landrace lines has reduced the genetic diversity of the Landrace population in the Netherlands, although a large proportion of the original variation is maintained. Thus, our recommendation is to conserve breeding lines in a gene bank before they are merged.

Citing Articles

Evolution under intensive industrial breeding: skull size and shape comparison between historic and modern pig lineages.

Haruda A, Evin A, Steinheimer F, Schafberg R R Soc Open Sci. 2025; 12(2):241039.

PMID: 39911888 PMC: 11793964. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241039.


Genomic analysis of the rare British Lop pig and identification of distinctive genomic markers.

Banos G, Talenti A, Chatziplis D, Sanchez-Molano E PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0271053.

PMID: 35960784 PMC: 9374264. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271053.


Opportunities of Genomics for the Use of Semen Cryo-Conserved in Gene Banks.

Oldenbroek J, Windig J Front Genet. 2022; 13:907411.

PMID: 35938018 PMC: 9350965. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.907411.


Selection and Drift: A Comparison between Historic and Recent Dutch Friesian Cattle and Recent Holstein Friesian Using WGS Data.

Hulsegge I, Oldenbroek K, Bouwman A, Veerkamp R, Windig J Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35158654 PMC: 8833835. DOI: 10.3390/ani12030329.


Analysis of Homozygous-by-Descent (HBD) Segments for Purebred and Crossbred Pigs in Russia.

Bakoev S, Kolosov A, Bakoev F, Kostyunina O, Bakoev N, Romanets T Life (Basel). 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34440604 PMC: 8400874. DOI: 10.3390/life11080861.


References
1.
Hillel J, Groenen M, Tixier-Boichard M, Korol A, David L, Kirzhner V . Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet Sel Evol. 2003; 35(5):533-57. PMC: 2697980. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-35-6-533. View

2.
Fowler K, Pong-Wong R, Bauer J, Clemente E, Reitter C, Affara N . Genome wide analysis reveals single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with fatness and putative novel copy number variants in three pig breeds. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:784. PMC: 3879217. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-784. View

3.
Muir W, Wong G, Zhang Y, Wang J, Groenen M, Crooijmans R . Genome-wide assessment of worldwide chicken SNP genetic diversity indicates significant absence of rare alleles in commercial breeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(45):17312-7. PMC: 2582254. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806569105. View

4.
Abd El Naby W, Hagos T, Hossain M, Salilew-Wondim D, Gad A, Rings F . Expression analysis of regulatory microRNAs in bovine cumulus oocyte complex and preimplantation embryos. Zygote. 2011; 21(1):31-51. DOI: 10.1017/S0967199411000566. View

5.
Saitou N, Nei M . The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4):406-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. View