» Articles » PMID: 31663966

Multicenter Study of the Treatment of Appendicitis in America: Acute, Perforated, and Gangrenous (MUSTANG), an EAST Multicenter Study

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Oct 31
PMID 31663966
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We sought to describe contemporary presentation, treatment, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute (A), perforated (P), and gangrenous (G) appendicitis in the United States.

Summary Background Data: Recent European trials have reported that medical (antibiotics only) treatment of acute appendicitis is an acceptable alternative to surgical appendectomy. However, the type of operation (open appendectomy) and average duration of stay are not consistent with current American practice and therefore their conclusions do not apply to modern American surgeons.

Methods: This multicenter prospective observational study enrolled adults with appendicitis from January 2017 to June 2018. Descriptive statistics were performed. P and G were combined into a "complicated" outcome variable and risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: A total 3597 subjects were enrolled across 28 sites: median age was 37 (27-52) years, 1918 (53%) were male, 90% underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging, 91% were initially treated by appendectomy (98% laparoscopic), and median hospital stay was 1 (1-2) day. The 30-day rates of Emergency Department (ED) visit and readmission were 10% and 6%. Of 219 initially treated with antibiotics, 35 (16%) required appendectomy during index hospitalization and 12 (5%) underwent appendectomy within 30 days, for a cumulative failure rate of 21%. Overall, 2403 (77%) patients had A, whereas 487 (16%) and 218 (7%) patients had P and G, respectively. On regression analysis, age, symptoms >48 hours, temperature, WBC, Alvarado score, and appendicolith were predictive of "complicated" appendicitis, whereas co-morbidities, smoking, and ED triage to appendectomy >6 hours or >12 hours were not.

Conclusion: In the United States, the majority of patients presenting with appendicitis receive CT imaging, undergo laparoscopic appendectomy, and stay in the hospital for 1 day. One in five patients selected for initial non-operative management required appendectomy within 30 days. In-hospital delay to appendectomy is not a risk factor for "complicated" appendicitis.

Citing Articles

The contemporary management of perforated appendicitis in adults: To operate or wait?.

Fitzgerald C, Kernell C, Mejia-Martinez V, Peng G, Zakaria H, Zhu M Surg Open Sci. 2024; 20:242-246.

PMID: 39156487 PMC: 11327589. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.008.


Preoperative in-hospital delay increases postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis.

Tang G, Zhang L, Xia L, Zhang J, Chen R, Zhou R Int J Surg. 2024; 111(1):1275-1284.

PMID: 38990284 PMC: 11745585. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001938.


Applying an explainable machine learning model might reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high probability of acute appendicitis.

Males I, Boban Z, Kumric M, Vrdoljak J, Berkovic K, Pogorelic Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12772.

PMID: 38834671 PMC: 11150468. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63513-x.


The benefits of interval appendectomy and risk factors for nonoperative management failure in the therapeutic strategy for complicated appendicitis.

Takeda K, Yamada T, Uehara K, Matsuda A, Shinji S, Yokoyama Y Surg Today. 2024; 54(11):1309-1318.

PMID: 38598170 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02842-w.


Diagnostic accuracy of doctors at the emergency department and radiologists in differentiating between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

Scheijmans J, Bom W, Deniz R, van Geloven A, Boermeester M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(3):837-845.

PMID: 38228896 PMC: 11249706. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02442-2.