» Articles » PMID: 31663775

Exposure to Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Case-Cohort Study in the French Cohort D.E.S.I.R

Overview
Date 2019 Oct 31
PMID 31663775
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The question of whether exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) contributes to the development of type 2 diabetes is still unresolved. Most epidemiological evidence on the association between BPA and diabetes is from cross-sectional studies or longitudinal studies with single urinary measurements. No prospective study has examined exposure to BPA analogs such as bisphenol S (BPS) in relation to incident type 2 diabetes.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether exposure to BPA and BPS, assessed at up to two time points, was associated with the incidence of type 2 diabetes.

Methods: We performed a case-cohort study on 755 participants without diabetes at baseline and followed-up over 9 y as part of the French prospective cohort Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (D.E.S.I.R.). BPA-glucuronide (BPA-G) and BPS-glucuronide (BPS-G) were assessed in fasting spot urine samples collected during the health examinations at baseline and 3 y later. Associations with incident diabetes were examined using Prentice-weighted Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 201 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were diagnosed over the follow-up, including 30 in the subcohort. Compared with participants with the lowest average BPA exposure (below the first quartile), participants in the second, third, and fourth quartile groups of exposure had a near doubling of the risk of type 2 diabetes, with a hazard ratio 2.56 (95% CI: 1.16, 5.65), 2.35 (95% CI: 1.07, 5.15), and 1.56 (95% CI: 0.68, 3.55), respectively. The detection of BPS-G in urine at one or both time points was associated with incident diabetes, with an 2.81 (95% CI: 1.74, 4.53).

Discussion: This study shows positive associations between exposure to BPA and BPS and the incidence of type 2 diabetes, independent of traditional diabetes risk factors. Our results should be confirmed by recent, population-based observational studies in different populations and settings. Overall, these findings raise concerns about using BPS as a BPA substitute. Further research on BPA analogs is warranted. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5159.

Citing Articles

as a Model to Assess the Potential Risk to Human Health Associated with the Use of Bisphenol A and Its Substitutes.

Kaiglova A, Bardyova Z, Hockickova P, Zvolenska A, Melnikov K, Kucharikova S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076635 PMC: 11900329. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052013.


Temporal and geographic variability of bisphenol levels in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international biomonitoring data.

Acevedo J, Kahn L, Pierce K, Carrasco A, Singer Rosenberg M, Trasande L Environ Res. 2024; 264(Pt 1):120341.

PMID: 39522874 PMC: 11863187. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120341.


Associations between antimony exposure and glycated hemoglobin levels in adolescents aged 12-19 years: results from the NHANES 2013-2016.

Feng B, Tang P, He S, Peng Z, Mo Y, Zhu L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1439034.

PMID: 39484344 PMC: 11524935. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439034.


The Adverse Impact of Bisphenol A Exposure on Optimal Cardiovascular Health as Measured by Life's Essential 8 in U.S. Adults: Evidence from NHANES 2005 to 2016.

Chen Y, Xu C, Huang Y, Liu Z, Zou J, Zhu H Nutrients. 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39408220 PMC: 11478777. DOI: 10.3390/nu16193253.


Environmental endocrine disruptor-induced mitochondrial dysfunction: a potential mechanism underlying diabetes and its complications.

He K, Chen R, Xu S, Ding Y, Wu Z, Bao M Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1422752.

PMID: 39211449 PMC: 11357934. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1422752.


References
1.
Stahlhut R, Welshons W, Swan S . Bisphenol A data in NHANES suggest longer than expected half-life, substantial nonfood exposure, or both. Environ Health Perspect. 2009; 117(5):784-9. PMC: 2685842. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0800376. View

2.
Ranciere F, Lyons J, Loh V, Botton J, Galloway T, Wang T . Bisphenol A and the risk of cardiometabolic disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence. Environ Health. 2015; 14:46. PMC: 4472611. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-015-0036-5. View

3.
Nepomnaschy P, Baird D, Weinberg C, Hoppin J, Longnecker M, Wilcox A . Within-person variability in urinary bisphenol A concentrations: measurements from specimens after long-term frozen storage. Environ Res. 2009; 109(6):734-7. PMC: 2810154. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.04.004. View

4.
Ye X, Wong L, Bishop A, Calafat A . Variability of urinary concentrations of bisphenol A in spot samples, first morning voids, and 24-hour collections. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119(7):983-8. PMC: 3223007. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002701. View

5.
Volkel W, Colnot T, Csanady G, Filser J, Dekant W . Metabolism and kinetics of bisphenol a in humans at low doses following oral administration. Chem Res Toxicol. 2002; 15(10):1281-7. DOI: 10.1021/tx025548t. View