» Articles » PMID: 31661486

Perceived Barriers in Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Youth in Lao People's Democratic Republic

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Oct 30
PMID 31661486
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sexual activity during youth is common in Lao PDR. However, young people seldom utilize sexual and reproductive health services and subsequently suffer from poor sexual and reproductive health. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the barriers perceived by youth that prevent their access to sexual and reproductive health services.

Methods: Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 participants aged 15-25 years, from urban and rural areas. A vignette was used during interviews with those who had no experience with sexual and reproductive health services. Additionally, seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with health providers from youth-friendly health clinics and from public sexual and reproductive health services. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach.

Results: The main barriers preventing young people from accessing sexual and reproductive health services were related to cognitive accessibility and psychosocial accessibility. The cognitive accessibility barriers were a lack of sexual knowledge and a lack of awareness of services. Perceived barriers in psychosocial accessibility were the feelings of shyness and shame caused by negative cultural attitudes to premarital sex, and the fear of parents finding out about visits to public sexual and reproductive health services, due to lack of confidentiality in the services and among health providers. In addition, the barriers of geographical accessibility, mainly insufficient availability of youth-friendly health clinics.

Conclusion: To improve access to services, a multi-component strategy is needed: promotion of youth-friendly health clinics; sexual education in schools; a formal referral system between schools and youth-friendly health clinics; and community support interventions. Prior to implementation, more research should be done on the applicability of these methods in the Laos context. Future research should try to determine the cost-effectiveness of youth-friendly health clinics integrated in a district hospital and stand-alone clinics, to provide insight into which form should be further developed.

Citing Articles

Exploratory Qualitative Study to Investigate Factors Influencing Men's Utilization of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Kwa-Zulu Natal.

Nyalela M, Dlungwane T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767472 PMC: 11675311. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121632.


Barriers to Utilization of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services among Young People in Nigeria: A Qualitative Exploration Using the Socioecological Model.

Olajubu A, Olowokere A, Naanyu V Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025; 12:23333936241310186.

PMID: 39758890 PMC: 11694304. DOI: 10.1177/23333936241310186.


A policy brief: improving access and utilization of adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Southern Ethiopia.

Sidamo N, Kerbo A, Gidebo K, Wado Y Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1364058.

PMID: 39639903 PMC: 11617508. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364058.


Exploring key challenges for healthcare providers and stakeholders in delivering adolescent sexual and reproductive health services and information during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study.

Munakampe M, Matenga T, Chewe M, Gold-Watts A, Lahidji R BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1541.

PMID: 39633359 PMC: 11616358. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11873-5.


Unveiling barriers to reproductive health awareness among rural adolescents: a systematic review.

Wahyuningsih S, Widati S, Praveena S, Azkiya M Front Reprod Health. 2024; 6:1444111.

PMID: 39628795 PMC: 11611845. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1444111.


References
1.
Chandra-Mouli V, Svanemyr J, Amin A, Fogstad H, Say L, Girard F . Twenty years after International Conference on Population and Development: where are we with adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights?. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 56(1 Suppl):S1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.015. View

2.
Brittain A, Williams J, Zapata L, Pazol K, Romero L, Weik T . Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(2 Suppl 1):S73-84. PMC: 6648673. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.019. View

3.
Agha S, Fareed A, Keating J . Clinical training alone is not sufficient for reducing barriers to IUD provision among private providers in Pakistan. Reprod Health. 2012; 8:40. PMC: 3275525. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-8-40. View

4.
Brittain A, Williams J, Zapata L, Moskosky S, Weik T . Confidentiality in Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(2 Suppl 1):S85-92. PMC: 4579525. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.001. View

5.
Tylee A, Haller D, Graham T, Churchill R, Sanci L . Youth-friendly primary-care services: how are we doing and what more needs to be done?. Lancet. 2007; 369(9572):1565-1573. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60371-7. View