» Articles » PMID: 31660195

ANCHOR Surgeon Views of Patient Selection and Expectations for Periacetabular Osteotomy

Overview
Date 2019 Oct 30
PMID 31660195
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preoperative expectations impact shared decision making and patient satisfaction. Surgeon views of patient selection, expected outcomes and patient expectations after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for treatment of acetabular dysplasia have not been defined. We assessed surgeon views of patient selection and expected outcomes after PAO. A sample of experienced PAO surgeons participated in semi-structured phone interviews assessing: (i) factors that determine patient candidacy for PAO; (ii) surgeon expectations for PAO outcomes; (iii) surgeon perceptions of patient expectations for PAO outcomes and (iv) surgeon perceptions of discrepancies in surgeon and patient expectations and approaches for reconciling these discrepancies. Twelve surgeons (77% of PAO-performing ANCHOR surgeons) participated. The factors most commonly mentioned in determining patient candidacy for PAO were: symptoms, radiographic findings, absence of arthritis and age. Only one-quarter of the sample mentioned patient expectations as a factor in determining patient candidacy for PAO. The most common surgeon expectations were: pain reduction, joint preservation, function with activities of daily living and return to desired activities. 58% of surgeons felt that surgeon and patient expectations align most of the time. Common expectation discrepancies included return to unrestricted activities and complete pain relief. Detailed discussion was the most commonly employed strategy to resolve expectation discrepancies. PAO surgeons felt that patient expectations of complete pain relief and return to unrestricted activities were misaligned with their own expectations. Development of an expectations survey may facilitate shared decision making.

Citing Articles

CORR Insights®: Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.

Castaneda P Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024; 483(1):137-139.

PMID: 39437443 PMC: 11658758. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003223.


Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.

Muir N, Orlin M, Rubertone P, Williams G Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024; 483(1):120-136.

PMID: 39051876 PMC: 11658753. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198.


Does pelvic tilt change with a peri-acetabular osteotomy?.

Verhaegen J, Dedeogullari E, Horton I, Beaule P, Grammatopoulos G J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024; 10(3-4):204-213.

PMID: 38162263 PMC: 10757406. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnad029.


Team Approach: Hip Preservation Surgery.

Kuhn A, Clohisy J, Troyer S, Cheng A, Hillen T, Pascual-Garrido C JBJS Rev. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37793005 PMC: 11421827. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00041.


Characteristics of the patellofemoral joint of patients with DDH and the effects of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy on the patellofemoral joint.

Peng J, Xiao F, Zhu J, Shen C, Li Y, Han X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):337.

PMID: 35395939 PMC: 8991590. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05291-z.


References
1.
Matheney T, Kim Y, Zurakowski D, Matero C, Millis M . Intermediate to long-term results following the bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2:115-29. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00646. View

2.
Ross C, Frommelt G, Hazelwood L, Chang R . The role of expectations in patient satisfaction with medical care. J Health Care Mark. 1987; 7(4):16-26. View

3.
Tilbury C, Haanstra T, Leichtenberg C, Verdegaal S, Ostelo R, de Vet H . Unfulfilled Expectations After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: There Is a Need for Better Preoperative Patient Information and Education. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(10):2139-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.061. View

4.
Ibrahim S . Decision Aids and Elective Joint Replacement - How Knowledge Affects Utilization. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(26):2509-2511. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1703432. View

5.
Bozic K, Eresian Chenok K, Schindel J, Chan V, Huddleston 3rd J, Braddock 3rd C . Patient, surgeon, and healthcare purchaser views on the use of decision and communication aids in orthopaedic surgery: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:366. PMC: 4162971. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-366. View