» Articles » PMID: 31657675

Acceptability of Technological Solutions for Overdose Monitoring: Perspectives of People Who Use Drugs

Overview
Journal Subst Abus
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2019 Oct 29
PMID 31657675
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Rising overdose deaths are a devastating problem across the United States and Canada. Despite the availability of observed consumption sites in British Columbia (BC), data suggest people who use drugs (PWUD) alone in private residences are most at risk of overdose death. These individuals may not use consumption sites due to fear of stigmatization, lack of privacy, or personal preference. It is this population that would benefit from overdose monitoring alternatives.

Methods: This 2018 study employed two sources of data. (1) A provincial harm reduction distribution site client survey administered at 27 sites across BC asked about cell phone possession and functionality. (2) Structured interviews with PWUD in Vancouver gathered perspectives regarding monitoring devices and alerting systems. : The client survey was administered to 486 individuals. Among 443 respondents, 48% ( = 212) owned a cellphone and 68% ( = 115) of individuals with a cellphone with access to internet ( = 168) would use an application to mitigate opioid-related overdose deaths. Thirty qualitative interviews were performed; thematic analysis of the responses identified three major themes - safety, public versus private drug use, and technological monitoring and function. The relevance of technological devices was affected by the inconsistent availability of cellphones, concerns about anonymity, as well as personal comfort while using drugs. : Technological applications may not be suitable for clients with transient lifestyles, no permanent home, and lack of consistent access to a mobile device. Thorough needs assessments, considerations of lifestyle limitations, and understanding perceptions around cellphone and overdose monitoring can increase the potential that devices will be used.Highlights45% ( 219) of client survey respondents owned a cellphoneOut of cellphone owners, 59% ( 102) of client survey respondents had access to internetOf 168 with internet access, 68% willing to use any applications for overdose responseApplications not suitable for transient lifestyles, no permanent home, and lack of consistent access to cellphone.

Citing Articles

Using illicit drugs alone in Vancouver, Canada: a gender-based analysis.

Gallant K, Hayashi K, Sayre E, Choi J, Mansoor M, Kerr T Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025; 20(1):9.

PMID: 39987447 PMC: 11846176. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-025-00637-x.


Perceptions of overdose response hotlines and applications among rural and remote individuals who use drugs in Canada: a qualitative study.

Viste D, Rioux W, Medwid M, Williams K, Tailfeathers E, Lee A Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2024; 44(11-12):471-481.

PMID: 39607434 PMC: 11728862. DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.44.11/12.03.


An autonomous implantable device for the prevention of death from opioid overdose.

Ciatti J, Vazquez-Guardado A, Brings V, Park J, Ruyle B, Ober R Sci Adv. 2024; 10(43):eadr3567.

PMID: 39441938 PMC: 11498215. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adr3567.


A Radar-Based Opioid Overdose Detection Device for Public Restrooms: Design, Development, and Evaluation Study.

Oreskovic J, Kaufman J, Thommandram A, Fossat Y JMIR Biomed Eng. 2024; 8:e51754.

PMID: 38875668 PMC: 11041516. DOI: 10.2196/51754.


Accessibility gaps of physical supervised consumption sites in Canada motivating the use of overdose response technology/phone based virtual overdose response services: a retrospective cohort study.

Mocanu V, Viste D, Rioux W, Ghosh S Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024; 34:100770.

PMID: 38798948 PMC: 11127238. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100770.