» Articles » PMID: 31647746

The Wiring of Intelligence

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2019 Oct 25
PMID 31647746
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The positive manifold of intelligence has fascinated generations of scholars in human ability. In the past century, various formal explanations have been proposed, including the dominant factor, the revived sampling theory, and the recent multiplier effect model and mutualism model. In this article, we propose a novel idiographic explanation. We formally conceptualize intelligence as evolving networks in which new facts and procedures are wired together during development. The static model, an extension of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn model, provides a parsimonious explanation of the positive manifold and intelligence's hierarchical factor structure. We show how it can explain the Matthew effect across developmental stages. Finally, we introduce a method for studying growth dynamics. Our truly idiographic approach offers a new view on a century-old construct and ultimately allows the fields of human ability and human learning to coalesce.

Citing Articles

Measurement Invariance Testing Works.

Lasker J Appl Psychol Meas. 2024; 48(6):257-275.

PMID: 39166183 PMC: 11331746. DOI: 10.1177/01466216241261708.


A multi-faceted role of dual-state dopamine signaling in working memory, attentional control, and intelligence.

Matzel L, Sauce B Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1060786.

PMID: 36873775 PMC: 9978119. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1060786.


Tracking a multitude of abilities as they develop.

Bolsinova M, Brinkhuis M, Hofman A, Maris G Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022; 75(3):753-778.

PMID: 35661350 PMC: 9796260. DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12276.


Guest Editors' Introduction to The Special Issue "Network Psychometrics in Action": Methodological Innovations Inspired by Empirical Problems.

Marsman M, Rhemtulla M Psychometrika. 2022; 87(1):1-11.

PMID: 35397084 PMC: 9021145. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09861-x.


Possible Futures for Network Psychometrics.

Borsboom D Psychometrika. 2022; 87(1):253-265.

PMID: 35334037 PMC: 9021084. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09851-z.


References
1.
Scarr S . Developmental theories for the 1990s: development and individual differences. Child Dev. 1992; 63(1):1-19. View

2.
Plomin R, Deary I . Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Mol Psychiatry. 2014; 20(1):98-108. PMC: 4270739. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2014.105. View

3.
Tucker-Drob E, Bates T . Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence. Psychol Sci. 2015; 27(2):138-149. PMC: 4749462. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615612727. View

4.
Scarr S, McCartney K . How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype greater than environment effects. Child Dev. 1983; 54(2):424-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1983.tb03884.x. View

5.
Horn J, Cattell R . Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. J Educ Psychol. 1966; 57(5):253-70. DOI: 10.1037/h0023816. View