» Articles » PMID: 31640735

Association Between Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement and Osteitis Pubis in Non-athletic Population on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Oct 24
PMID 31640735
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Osteitis pubis (OP) is a common source of groin and extra-articular hip pain and is associated with intra-articular hip pathology. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of osteitis pubis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in non-athletic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 178 subjects: 90 patients with cam-type FAI diagnosed by MRI and 88 subjects used as a control group. Additionally, their MRI data were analyzed for the characteristics of osteitis pubis, with severity graded from minimal to severe on a four-point scale.

Results: A total of 98 patients and 88 controls were studied. Seventy-two males (80%) and 18 females (20%) were the patient group, whereas 71 males (80.68%) and 17 females (19.32%) were the control group. The mean alpha angle of the patients with FAI was 65.8 ± 3.3° in the right side and 66.2 ± 3.2° in the left side, whereas in the control group, it was 47 ± 5.6° in the right side and 47.8 ± 5.2° in the left side. Alpha angle measurements were significantly higher in the patient group than the control group (p < 0.001). A statistically significant increase in the prevalence of osteitis pubis was found in patients with cam-type FAI (45.56%) compared to control subjects (5.68%) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the frequency of osteitis pubis was increased in non-athletic patients with FAI syndrome. Further studies are required to determine whether these findings reflect the clinical symptoms in patients with hip pain.

Citing Articles

Primary care level prevalence of osteitis pubis in non-athlete patients in hill region: A short communication and a proposal for simple radiological grading.

Dharmshaktu G J Family Med Prim Care. 2023; 12(4):783-787.

PMID: 37312763 PMC: 10259561. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_105_21.


Hip Range of Motion and Strength in Male Athletes with Stage 1 Osteitis Pubis: A Cross-Sectional and Correlational Study.

Ceballos-Laita L, Hernando-Garijo I, Medrano-de-la-Fuente R, Mingo-Gomez M, Carrasco-Uribarren A, Jimenez-Del-Barrio S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36232123 PMC: 9564700. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912824.


Editorial.

Field R J Hip Preserv Surg. 2022; 8(4):309-310.

PMID: 35505806 PMC: 9052428. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnac014.


The prevalence and risk factors of pubic bone marrow edema in femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia.

Shimodaira H, Hatakeyama A, Suzuki H, Takada S, Murata Y, Sakai A J Hip Preserv Surg. 2022; 8(4):318-324.

PMID: 35505801 PMC: 9052425. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnab081.

References
1.
Notzli H, Wyss T, Stoecklin C, Schmid M, Treiber K, Hodler J . The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(4):556-60. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.12014. View

2.
Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris W . The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(2):264-72. PMC: 2505145. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z. View

3.
Ratzlaff C, Zhang C, Korzan J, Josey L, Wong H, Cibere J . The validity of a non-radiologist reader in identifying cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using plain radiography. Rheumatol Int. 2015; 36(3):371-6. PMC: 5762185. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-015-3361-7. View

4.
Paajanen H, Heikkinen J, Hermunen H, Airo I . Successful treatment of osteitis pubis by using totally extraperitoneal endoscopic technique. Int J Sports Med. 2005; 26(4):303-6. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820975. View

5.
Larson C, Pierce B, Giveans M . Treatment of athletes with symptomatic intra-articular hip pathology and athletic pubalgia/sports hernia: a case series. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(6):768-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.018. View