» Articles » PMID: 31640589

Half-body MRI Volumetry of Abdominal Adipose Tissue in Patients with Obesity

Overview
Journal BMC Med Imaging
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Oct 24
PMID 31640589
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent the whole volumes of abdominal subcutaneous (ASAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) of patients with obesity can be predicted by using data of one body half only. Such a workaround has already been reported for dual-energy x-ray absorption (DEXA) scans and becomes feasible whenever the field of view of an imaging technique is not large enough.

Methods: Full-body abdominal MRI data of 26 patients from an obesity treatment center (13 females and 13 males, BMI range 30.8-41.2 kg/m, 32.6-61.5 years old) were used as reference (REF). MRI was performed with IRB approval on a clinical 1.5 T MRI (Achieva dStream, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands). Segmentation of adipose tissue was performed with a custom-made Matlab software tool. Statistical measures of agreement were the coefficient of determination R of a linear fit.

Results: Mean ASAT was 12,976 (7812-24,161) cm and mean VAT was 4068 (1137-7518) cm. Mean half-body volumes relative to the whole-body values were 50.8% (48.2-53.7%) for ASAT and 49.2% (46.3-51.8%) for ASAT. Corresponding volume fractions were 56.4% (51.4-65.9%) for VAT and 43.6% (34.1-48.6%) for VAT. Correlations of ASAT with ASAT as well as with ASAT were both excellent (R > 0.99, p < 0.01). Corresponding correlations of VAT were marginally lower (R = 0.98 for VAT, p < 0.01, and R = 0.97 for VAT, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: In conclusion, abdominal fat volumes can be reliably assessed by half-body MRI data, in particular the subcutaneous fat compartment.

Citing Articles

The Lipo-DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Valuable Innovation for Maximizing Abdominal Tissue Volume.

Longo B, DOrsi G, Farcomeni A, Giacalone M, Gagliano E, Vannucchi L Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025; 13(1):e6445.

PMID: 39830442 PMC: 11741219. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006445.


MRI-based quantification of adipose tissue distribution in healthy adult cats during body weight gain.

Del Chicca F, Richter H, Muller H, Kassubek J Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1150085.

PMID: 37215477 PMC: 10196178. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1150085.


Obesity and Heath-Carter Somatotyping of 3438 Adults in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China by Multivariate Analysis.

Liu X, Li W, Wen Y, Xu G, Zhou G, Qu Q Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021; 14:659-670.

PMID: 33623401 PMC: 7894874. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S287954.

References
1.
Schaudinn A, Linder N, Garnov N, Kerlikowsky F, Bluher M, Dietrich A . Predictive accuracy of single- and multi-slice MRI for the estimation of total visceral adipose tissue in overweight to severely obese patients. NMR Biomed. 2015; 28(5):583-90. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3286. View

2.
Schwenzer N, Machann J, Schraml C, Springer F, Ludescher B, Stefan N . Quantitative analysis of adipose tissue in single transverse slices for estimation of volumes of relevant fat tissue compartments: a study in a large cohort of subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes by MRI with comparison to anthropometric data. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45(12):788-94. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f10fe1. View

3.
Wajchenberg B, Giannella-Neto D, Da Silva M, Santos R . Depot-specific hormonal characteristics of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue and their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Horm Metab Res. 2003; 34(11-12):616-21. DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-38256. View

4.
Sam S . Differential effect of subcutaneous abdominal and visceral adipose tissue on cardiometabolic risk. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2018; 33(1). DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2018-0014. View

5.
Tataranni P, Ravussin E . Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995; 62(4):730-4. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/62.4.730. View