» Articles » PMID: 31636943

Genetics of Adaptation: Experimental Test of a Biotic Mechanism Driving Divergence in Traits and Genes

Overview
Journal Evol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Oct 23
PMID 31636943
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The genes underlying adaptations are becoming known, yet the causes of selection on genes-a key step in the study of the genetics of adaptation-remains uncertain. We address this issue experimentally in a threespine stickleback species pair showing exaggerated divergence in bony defensive armor in association with competition-driven character displacement. We used semi-natural ponds to test the role of a native predator in causing divergent evolution of armor and two known underlying genes. Predator presence/absence altered selection on dorsal spines and allele frequencies at the gene across a generation. Evolutionary trajectories of alleles at a second gene, , and the pelvic spine trait it controls, were more variable. Our experiment demonstrates how manipulation of putative selective agents helps to identify causes of evolutionary divergence at key genes, rule out phenotypic plasticity as a sole determinant of phenotypic differences, and eliminate reliance on fitness surrogates. Divergence of predation regimes in sympatric stickleback is associated with coevolution in response to resource competition, implying a cascade of biotic interactions driving species divergence. We suggest that as divergence proceeds, an increasing number of biotic interactions generate divergent selection, causing more evolution in turn. In this way, biotic adaptation perpetuates species divergence through time during adaptive radiation in an expanding number of traits and genes.

Citing Articles

Negative global-scale association between genetic diversity and speciation rates in mammals.

Afonso Silva A, Maliet O, Aristide L, Nogues-Bravo D, Upham N, Jetz W Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1796.

PMID: 39979262 PMC: 11842793. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56820-y.


Intraspecific diversity is critical to population-level risk assessments.

Shahmohamadloo R, Rudman S, Clare C, Westrick J, Wang X, De Meester L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25883.

PMID: 39468236 PMC: 11519591. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76734-x.


A test for microbiome-mediated rescue via host phenotypic plasticity in .

Shahmohamadloo R, Gabidulin A, Andrews E, Fryxell J, Rudman S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39185203 PMC: 11343196. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.14.607994.


The genetic basis of divergent melanic pigmentation in benthic and limnetic threespine stickleback.

Tapanes E, Rennison D Heredity (Edinb). 2024; 133(4):207-215.

PMID: 39048622 PMC: 11437277. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-024-00706-0.


Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance increases trait variation but is not adaptive.

Shahmohamadloo R, Fryxell J, Rudman S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38659883 PMC: 11042258. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.15.589575.


References
1.
Barrett R, Hoekstra H . Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12(11):767-80. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3015. View

2.
Voje K, Holen O, Liow L, Stenseth N . The role of biotic forces in driving macroevolution: beyond the Red Queen. Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1808):20150186. PMC: 4455800. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0186. View

3.
Marchinko K . Predation's role in repeated phenotypic and genetic divergence of armor in threespine stickleback. Evolution. 2008; 63(1):127-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00529.x. View

4.
Chan Y, Marks M, Jones F, Villarreal Jr G, Shapiro M, Brady S . Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science. 2009; 327(5963):302-5. PMC: 3109066. DOI: 10.1126/science.1182213. View

5.
Barrett R, Laurent S, Mallarino R, Pfeifer S, Xu C, Foll M . Linking a mutation to survival in wild mice. Science. 2019; 363(6426):499-504. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav3824. View