» Articles » PMID: 31632943

Screening for Multiple Types of Family Violence: Development and Validation of the Family Polyvictimization Screen

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Oct 22
PMID 31632943
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different types of violence tend to co-occur within a family where the members often share common family characteristics, a situation described as family polyvictimization. In response to the lack of a validated screening tool, this study developed and validated the Family Polyvictimization Screen (FPS), the first brief screening tool applicable to members of the same family with up to three generations. The FPS was designed to screen family polyvictimization by assessing and capturing different types of violence, including child abuse and neglect (CAN), intimate partner violence (IPV), and elder abuse. The FPS was compared with the Criterion Standard scales. It is suitable for use as a self-report for individual family members for specific violence or as a proxy report for an adult family member to serve as informant. In this study, a community sample of 445 households was recruited from Hong Kong ( = 250) and Shanghai ( = 195). One adult parent from each three-generation family was selected as the informant to report all family polyvictimization experiences in the preceding year. Moderate to high agreement (79.1-99.8%) was found between the FPS and the standard measurements, such as the revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) and the Conflict Tactics Scales: Parent-Child Version (CTSPC). Exceptions appeared in regard to physical assault on elders due to the rarity of reported cases. The specificity was high, while the sensitivity estimates appeared low, especially for the more sensitive sexual abuse cases. The validated FPS demonstrated its potential utility as a brief tool for screening family polyvictimization in clinical settings with substantial agreement and satisfactory accuracy in the Chinese population.

Citing Articles

Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review.

Mohd Mydin F, Mikton C, Choo W, Shunmugam R, Murray A, Yon Y Campbell Syst Rev. 2024; 20(3):e1419.

PMID: 39211334 PMC: 11358705. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1419.


Development of A Japanese Version of the Family Poly-Victimization Screen (FPS-J).

Kita S, Baba K, Iwasaki-Motegi R, Kishi E, Kamibeppu K, Malmedal W Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36833835 PMC: 9965200. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043142.


Development, validation, and pilot implementation of the minimum datasheet for a domestic violence registry system: The case of a developing country.

Iezadi S, Gholipour K, Khanijahani A, Alizadeh M, Samadirad B, Azizi H PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261460.

PMID: 34972149 PMC: 8719697. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261460.

References
1.
Schofield M, Powers J, Loxton D . Mortality and disability outcomes of self-reported elder abuse: a 12-year prospective investigation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61(5):679-85. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12212. View

2.
Davis K, Gilmore A, Stappenbeck C, Balsan M, George W, Norris J . How to Score the Sexual Experiences Survey? A Comparison of Nine Methods. Psychol Violence. 2014; 4(4):445-461. PMC: 4264604. DOI: 10.1037/a0037494. View

3.
Fulmer T, Paveza G, Abraham I, Fairchild S . Elder neglect assessment in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2000; 26(5):436-43. DOI: 10.1067/men.2000.110621. View

4.
Vu N, Jouriles E, McDonald R, Rosenfield D . Children's exposure to intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis of longitudinal associations with child adjustment problems. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016; 46:25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.003. View

5.
Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D . Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994; 271(9):703-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.271.9.703. View