» Articles » PMID: 31630575

Opposing Age-Related Trends in Absolute and Relative Risk of Adverse Health Outcomes Associated With Out-of-Office Blood Pressure

Abstract

Participant-level meta-analyses assessed the age-specific relevance of office blood pressure to cardiovascular complications, but this information is lacking for out-of-office blood pressure. At baseline, daytime ambulatory (n=12 624) or home (n=5297) blood pressure were measured in 17 921 participants (51.3% women; mean age, 54.2 years) from 17 population cohorts. Subsequently, mortality and cardiovascular events were recorded. Using multivariable Cox regression, floating absolute risk was computed across 4 age bands (≤60, 61-70, 71-80, and >80 years). Over 236 491 person-years, 3855 people died and 2942 cardiovascular events occurred. From levels as low as 110/65 mm Hg, risk log-linearly increased with higher out-of-office systolic/diastolic blood pressure. From the youngest to the oldest age group, rates expressed per 1000 person-years increased (<0.001) from 4.4 (95% CI, 4.0-4.7) to 86.3 (76.1-96.5) for all-cause mortality and from 4.1 (3.9-4.6) to 59.8 (51.0-68.7) for cardiovascular events, whereas hazard ratios per 20-mm Hg increment in systolic out-of-office blood pressure decreased (≤0.0033) from 1.42 (1.19-1.69) to 1.09 (1.05-1.12) and from 1.70 (1.51-1.92) to 1.12 (1.07-1.17), respectively. These age-related trends were similar for out-of-office diastolic pressure and were generally consistent in both sexes and across ethnicities. In conclusion, adverse outcomes were directly associated with out-of-office blood pressure in adults. At young age, the absolute risk associated with out-of-office blood pressure was low, but relative risk high, whereas with advancing age relative risk decreased and absolute risk increased. These observations highlight the need of a lifecourse approach for the management of hypertension.

Citing Articles

Modifiable factors and 10-year and lifetime cardiovascular disease risk in adults with new-onset hypertension: insights from the Kailuan cohort.

Wu S, Wang Y, Wang J, Feng J, Li F, Lin L BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):80.

PMID: 39934863 PMC: 11816795. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03923-4.


[Blood pressure patterns in pressurometry and their ralationship with cardiovascular events in follow-up].

Malano D, Perea J, Garcia Chamorro L, Goldaracena F, Mazuquin A, Corzo S Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2024; 81(4):705-718.

PMID: 39670901 PMC: 11905778. DOI: 10.31053/1853.0605.v81.n3.44619.


Relationship of 24-Hour Mean Arterial Pressure with Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Hypertension: Insights from Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Karahan A, Zor U Anatol J Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39475169 PMC: 11633784. DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4514.


Development and Worsening of Hypertension with Age in Male Wistar Rats as a Physiological Model of Age-Related Hypertension: Correction of Hypertension with Taxifolin.

Tukhovskaya E, Ismailova A, Perepechenova N, Slashcheva G, Palikov V, Palikova Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456996 PMC: 11509042. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011216.


Efficacy of antihypertensive treatment for target organ protection in patients with masked hypertension (ANTI-MASK): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Huang J, Zhang D, An D, Li M, Liu C, Feng Y EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 74:102736.

PMID: 39091669 PMC: 11293515. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102736.


References
1.
Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Hoshi H, Hashimoto J . Prediction of stroke by self-measurement of blood pressure at home versus casual screening blood pressure measurement in relation to the Joint National Committee 7 classification: the Ohasama study. Stroke. 2004; 35(10):2356-61. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000141679.42349.9f. View

2.
Niiranen T, Hanninen M, Johansson J, Reunanen A, Jula A . Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: the Finn-Home study. Hypertension. 2010; 55(6):1346-51. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.149336. View

3.
Ingelsson E, Bjorklund-Bodegard K, Lind L, Arnlov J, Sundstrom J . Diurnal blood pressure pattern and risk of congestive heart failure. JAMA. 2006; 295(24):2859-66. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.24.2859. View

4.
Kuznetsova T, Malyutina S, Pello E, Thijs L, Nikitin Y, Staessen J . Ambulatory blood pressure of adults in Novosibirsk, Russia: interim report on a population study. Blood Press Monit. 2001; 5(5-6):291-6. DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200010000-00007. View

5.
Lacey B, Lewington S, Clarke R, Kong X, Chen Y, Guo Y . Age-specific association between blood pressure and vascular and non-vascular chronic diseases in 0·5 million adults in China: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(6):e641-e649. PMC: 5960069. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30217-1. View