» Articles » PMID: 31628927

Development, Validation, and Interpretation of the PROMIS Itch Questionnaire: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for the Quality of Life Impact of Itch

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2019 Oct 20
PMID 31628927
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current patient-reported outcome measures for itch are limited and may not capture its full impact on health-related quality of life. We sought to develop, calibrate, and validate banks of questions assessing the health-related quality of life impact of itch as part of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. A systematic process of literature review, content-expert review, qualitative research, testing in a sample of 600 adults, classical test theory methods, and item response theory analyses were applied. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were followed by item response theory model and item fit analyses. Four itch-related item banks were developed: (i) general concerns, (ii) mood and sleep, (iii) clothing and physical activity, and (iv) scratching behavior. Item response theory and expert content review narrowed the item banks to 25, 18, 15, and 5 items, respectively. Validity of the item banks was supported by good convergent and discriminant validity with itch intensity, internal consistency, and no significant floor or ceiling effects. In conclusion, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Itch Questionnaire banks have excellent measurement properties and efficiently and comprehensively assess the burden of itch.

Citing Articles

Capturing patient-reported sleep disturbance in atopic dermatitis clinical trials.

Dias-Barbosa C, Silverberg J, Stander S, Rodriguez D, Fofana F, Filipenko D J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):73.

PMID: 39008191 PMC: 11250737. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00751-7.


A Comprehensive Review of Evaluating Donor Site Morbidity and Scar Outcomes in Skin Transfer Techniques.

Manek Y, Jajoo S, Mahakalkar C Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53433.

PMID: 38435178 PMC: 10909122. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53433.


Commentary on "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology".

Patel H, Feldman S Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023; 24(4):497-498.

PMID: 37338787 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-023-00794-4.


Patient-Reported Outcome Dashboards Within the Electronic Health Record to Support Shared Decision-making: Protocol for Co-design and Clinical Evaluation With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Perry L, Morken V, Peipert J, Yanez B, Garcia S, Barnard C JMIR Res Protoc. 2022; 11(9):e38461.

PMID: 36129747 PMC: 9536520. DOI: 10.2196/38461.


DESCRIBE-AD: A novel classification framework for atopic dermatitis.

Chovatiya R, Silverberg J J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021; 87(3):541-550.

PMID: 34774658 PMC: 10119387. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.10.058.


References
1.
Bender B, Leung S, Leung D . Actigraphy assessment of sleep disturbance in patients with atopic dermatitis: an objective life quality measure. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111(3):598-602. DOI: 10.1067/mai.2003.174. View

2.
Petersen J, Austin D, Sack R, Hayes T . Actigraphy-based scratch detection using logistic regression. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2012; 17(2):277-83. DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2012.2204761. View

3.
Phan N, Blome C, Fritz F, Gerss J, Reich A, Ebata T . Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011; 92(5):502-7. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1246. View

4.
Cordova-Rivera L, Gibson P, Gardiner P, McDonald V . A Systematic Review of Associations of Physical Activity and Sedentary Time with Asthma Outcomes. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018; 6(6):1968-1981.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.02.027. View

5.
Shive M, Linos E, Berger T, Wehner M, Chren M . Itch as a patient-reported symptom in ambulatory care visits in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013; 69(4):550-6. PMC: 3775992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.029. View