» Articles » PMID: 31624988

Visual Acuity and Defocus Curves with Six Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Overview
Journal Int Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2019 Oct 19
PMID 31624988
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-masked, study was to compare the visual performance of patients after bilateral implantation of six different IOLs.

Methods: The following IOLs were used in the study: SV25T0 (n = 19), ATLISA 809M (n = 18), ATLISA Tri 839MP (n = 19), ZKB00 (n = 20), ZLB00 (n = 20) and Symfony ZXR00 (n = 20). Visual performance was assessed by the monocular distance-corrected visual acuity at 4 m (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 60 cm and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at 40 cm. Binocular defocus curves were obtained for a range of defocus from + 1.50 D to - 4.50 D, in 0.50 D steps. Quality of life was assessed with the VF-14 questionnaire.

Results: CDVA was better with the Symfony ZXR00 than with the SV25T0 (p = 0.032), ATLISA Tri 839MP (p = 0.032) and ATLISA 809M (p = 0.018). The Symfony ZXR00 offered the best DCIVA, followed by the ZKB00. The best and worst DCNVA results corresponded to the ZLB00, and the SV25T0 and Symfony ZXR00, respectively. Defocus curves at distance were good in all groups, although the Symfony had a wider range of clear vision (- 1.50 D to + 0.50 D), with no decay. For intermediate vision, only the Symfony obtained sharp visual acuity. The ATLISA 809M, ATLISA Tri 839MP and ZLB00 were superior at near distance.

Conclusions: The extended depth of focus of the Symfony ZXR00 offers a superior range of clear vision at far and intermediate distances than other multifocal designs, with worse results at near distance. Visual outcomes reflect the particular optical, geometrical and power distribution characteristics of each IOL.

Citing Articles

Visual, clinical and quality of life outcomes of a new multifocal IOL with optimized diffractive grating: a non-randomized clinical trial.

Lyra J, de Almeida M, Lira L, Dos Santos L, Dos Santos M, de Miranda Coelho J BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1):57.

PMID: 39901127 PMC: 11792698. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-03878-3.


Innovative Polymeric Biomaterials for Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery.

Wu K, Khammar R, Sheikh H, Marchand M J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(12).

PMID: 39728191 PMC: 11678174. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15120391.


The Multifocal Pathway: A Pilot Study of a Trainee-Led Multifocal Intraocular Lens Protocol in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Australia.

Sartor L, Go C, Kong C, Yeung S, White A, Samarawickrama C Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:3693-3706.

PMID: 39676770 PMC: 11646369. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S484884.


Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Tavassoli S, Ziaei H, Yadegarfar M, Gokul A, Kernohan A, Evans J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 7:CD014891.

PMID: 38984608 PMC: 11234495. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014891.pub2.


A comparative study of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses combining bifocal and extended depth-of-focus profiles.

Kim J, Kim T, Seo K, Tchah H, Koh K Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):54.

PMID: 38341384 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-02979-0.


References
1.
Kretz F, Koss M, Auffarth G . Intermediate and near visual acuity of an aspheric, bifocal, diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with +3.25 D near addition. J Refract Surg. 2015; 31(5):295-9. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20150423-02. View

2.
Escandon-Garcia S, Ribeiro F, McAlinden C, Queiros A, Gonzalez-Meijome J . Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction. J Ophthalmol. 2018; 2018:6165493. PMC: 5831879. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6165493. View

3.
Steinberg E, Tielsch J, Schein O, Javitt J, Sharkey P, Cassard S . The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112(5):630-8. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170074026. View

4.
MacRae S, Holladay J, Glasser A, Calogero D, Hilmantel G, Masket S . Special Report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force Consensus Statement for Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. Ophthalmology. 2016; 124(1):139-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.039. View

5.
Akella S, Juthani V . Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses for presbyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018; 29(4):318-322. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000490. View