» Articles » PMID: 31624867

Training in Robotic Surgery, Replicating the Airline Industry. How Far Have We Come?

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 Oct 19
PMID 31624867
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: As the role of robot-assisted surgery continues to expand, development of standardised and validated training programmes is becoming increasingly important. We aim to compare current robotic training curricula with training in aviation, to evaluate current similarities and to provide insight into how healthcare can further learn from replicating initiatives in aviation training.

Methods: A systematic literature review of the current evidence was conducted online and relevant publications and information were identified. Evaluation and comparison between training in robotic surgery and the aviation industry was performed.

Results: There are significant similarities between modern robotic training curricula and pilot training. Both undergo basic training before proceeding to advanced training. Aviation training methods include classroom instruction, e-learning and practical training, in both the aircraft and flight simulation training devices. Both surgeon and pilot training include technical and procedural instruction as well as training in non-technical skills such as crisis management, decision making, leadership and communication. However, there is more regulation in aviation, with international standards for training curricula, simulation devices and instructors/trainers that are legally binding. Continuous learning with re-qualification with benchmarked high stakes tests are also mandatory throughout a pilot's and instructor's career.

Conclusion: Robotic surgeons and pilots roles have many fundamental similarities. Both work with expensive and complex technology requiring high levels of skills, within working environments with high physiological and psychological stress levels. Whilst many initiatives in aviation training have already been replicated in surgical training there remain considerable differences in regulation. Adopting established and proven aviation methods of assessment and regulation could help robotic surgical training become more efficient, more effective and ultimately safer.

Citing Articles

Can high-fidelity 3D models be a good alternative for cadaveric materials in skill assessment for endoscopic sinus surgery? A comparison study in assessment for surgical performance in 3D models and cadavers.

Suzuki M, Watanabe R, Nakazono A, Nakamaru Y, Suzuki T, Kimura S Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1301511.

PMID: 39484199 PMC: 11524814. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1301511.


Trends and outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional study of minimally invasive versus open techniques in Germany.

Krieg A, Kolbe E, Kaspari M, Krieg S, Loosen S, Roderburg C Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6338-6346.

PMID: 39210061 PMC: 11525431. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11210-1.


Assessment of the evolution of psychomotor skills in the robotic surgery simulation process.

Araujo Silva D, Szutan L, Zandonai A J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):317.

PMID: 39123078 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02069-4.


Prediction of Robotic Anastomosis Competency Evaluation (RACE) metrics during vesico-urethral anastomosis using electroencephalography, eye-tracking, and machine learning.

Shafiei S, Shadpour S, Mohler J, Rashidi P, Toussi M, Liu Q Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14611.

PMID: 38918593 PMC: 11199555. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65648-3.


Telesimulation Training for Endoscopic Mitral Valve Surgery: An Air-Pilot Training Concept for Distance Training.

Cheheili Sobbi S, Imran Hamid U, Arjomandi Rad A, Fillet M, Maesen J, Sardari Nia P Innovations (Phila). 2024; 19(2):169-174.

PMID: 38576087 PMC: 11055405. DOI: 10.1177/15569845241237778.


References
1.
Haynes A, Weiser T, Berry W, Lipsitz S, Breizat A, Dellinger E . A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(5):491-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119. View

2.
Mottrie A, Novara G, van der Poel H, Dasgupta P, Montorsi F, Gandaglia G . The European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum: An Update. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 2(1):105-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2015.09.002. View

3.
Collins J, Akre O, Challacombe B, Karim O, Wiklund P . Robotic networks: delivering empowerment through integration. BJU Int. 2015; 116(2):167-8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13032. View

4.
Lovegrove C, Novara G, Mottrie A, Guru K, Brown M, Challacombe B . Structured and Modular Training Pathway for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): Validation of the RARP Assessment Score and Learning Curve Assessment. Eur Urol. 2015; 69(3):526-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.048. View

5.
Dyer C . Bristol inquiry condemns hospital's "club culture". BMJ. 2001; 323(7306):181. PMC: 1120824. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.181. View