» Articles » PMID: 31622143

Rural-Urban Disparities in Pregnancy Intentions, Births, and Abortions Among US Adolescent and Young Women, 1995-2017

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Oct 18
PMID 31622143
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To examine rural-suburban-urban disparities in intendedness and resolution of first pregnancies among adolescent and young women (aged 15-19 and 20-24 years) across racial/ethnic backgrounds in the United States. We used the National Survey of Family Growth and pooled pregnancy files from 2002 through the 2015-2017 surveys. We report baseline rural-suburban-urban disparities in first pregnancy intention and outcomes. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate these disparities, accounting for sociodemographic background, religious upbringing, and other factors. The first adolescent pregnancies of rural women were more likely to be unintended and end in live birth relative to their urban counterparts. Disparities were most striking among Black adolescents, with about 60% of first adolescent pregnancies among rural Black women being unintended and ending in live birth (urban: 51%). Newly collected state health department data on rural and urban adolescent births and abortions corroborate the findings from the National Survey of Family Growth. Rural-urban differences in the share of first adolescent pregnancies ending in live births are not accounted for by pregnancy intention or confounding individual-level characteristics. Future research should explore the role of structural barriers, including access to family planning and abortion services.

Citing Articles

Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors Affecting Age at First Birth Among Tribal Women in India: An NFHS-5 Analysis.

Singh Sardar S, Singh Sardar S J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025; .

PMID: 40053219 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-025-02373-1.


Factors influencing abortion care-seeking outside of formal healthcare settings: lived experiences from Rwandan young women.

Ndayisenga J, Yamuragiye A, Oudshoorn A, Katende G, Nkurunziza A, Tengera O BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):578.

PMID: 39468559 PMC: 11520060. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03410-7.


Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.

Jackson H, Rendall M Health Serv Res. 2024; 59(5):e14358.

PMID: 39009037 PMC: 11366969. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14358.


How Can We Address What We Do Not Measure? A Systematic Scoping Review of the Measurement and Operationalization of Social Determinants of Health Research on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive among Adolescents in the US.

Poehling C, Downey M, Gwan A, Cannady S, Ismail O Adolescents. 2024; 3(2):240-258.

PMID: 38912095 PMC: 11192542. DOI: 10.3390/adolescents3020018.


Teen pregnancy involvement among African, Caribbean and Black adolescent boys and girls: A scoping review.

Ojukwu E, Bawafaa E, McKay E, Grewal H, Afsah S, Singh S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e078085.

PMID: 38834331 PMC: 11163604. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078085.


References
1.
Jones R, Jerman J . How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008?. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013; 22(8):706-13. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4283. View

2.
Finer L, Zolna M . Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011; 84(5):478-85. PMC: 3338192. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. View

3.
Aiken A, Borrero S, Callegari L, Dehlendorf C . Rethinking the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm: Unintended Conceptions or Unrepresentative Concepts?. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016; 48(3):147-51. PMC: 5028285. DOI: 10.1363/48e10316. View

4.
Hart L, Larson E, Lishner D . Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(7):1149-55. PMC: 1449333. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042432. View

5.
James W, Cossman J . Long-Term Trends in Black and White Mortality in the Rural United States: Evidence of a Race-Specific Rural Mortality Penalty. J Rural Health. 2016; 33(1):21-31. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12181. View