» Articles » PMID: 31620623

Clinical Significance of Lymph Node Size in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Oct 18
PMID 31620623
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the in-field lymph node (LN) failure rate according to LN size and to investigate effect of LN size on the survival outcome of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods: A total of 310 patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with CCRT were enrolled in retrospective study. LN status was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients received conventional external beam irradiation and high-dose rate brachytherapy, and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In-field LN failure rate according to LN size was analyzed.

Results: The median follow-up period was 83 months (range, 3-201 months). In-field LN failure rate in patients with pelvic LN size more than 10 mm was significantly higher than that in patients with pelvic LN size less than 10 mm (<0.001). A similar finding was observed in the in-field para-aortic LN (PALN) failure rate (=0.024). The pelvic and PALN size (≥10 mm) was a significant prognostic factor of overall-survival (OS) and disease-free survival rate in univariate and multivariate analyses. The OS rate was significantly different between groups according to LN size (<10 mm vs. ≥10 mm).

Conclusion: A LN of less than 10 mm in size in an imaging study is controlled by CCRT. On the other hand, in LN of more than 10 mm in size, the in-field LN failure rate increase and the prognosis deteriorate. Therefore, a more aggressive treatment strategy is needed.

Citing Articles

Can we triumph over locally advanced cervical cancer with colossal para-aortic lymph nodes? A case report.

Alzibdeh A, Mohamad I, Wahbeh L, Abuhijlih R, Abuhijla F World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(10):1851-1856.

PMID: 38660077 PMC: 11036483. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i10.1851.


Therapeutic effects of surgical debulking of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer IIICr: a trial protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled study (KGOG1047/DEBULK trial).

Yun B, Lee K, Lee K, Chang H, Kim J, Lim M J Gynecol Oncol. 2024; 35(5):e57.

PMID: 38330380 PMC: 11390256. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e57.


Efficacy of lymph node dissection on stage IIICr of cervical cancer before CCRT: study protocol for a phase III, randomized controlled clinical trial (CQGOG0103).

He M, Guo M, Zhou Q, Tang Y, Zhong L, Liu Q J Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 34(3):e55.

PMID: 36998225 PMC: 10157346. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e55.


Treatment of bulky lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer: boosting versus debulking.

Olthof E, Wenzel H, van der Velden J, Spijkerboer A, Bekkers R, Beltman J Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022; 32(7):861-868.

PMID: 35483738 PMC: 9279830. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003357.


Clinical Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Treated by Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy.

Katanyoo K, Thavaramara T Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021; 22(2):491-497.

PMID: 33639665 PMC: 8190339. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.2.491.


References
1.
Tsai C, Lai C, Chang T, Yen T, Ng K, Hsueh S . A prospective randomized trial to study the impact of pretreatment FDG-PET for cervical cancer patients with MRI-detected positive pelvic but negative para-aortic lymphadenopathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 76(2):477-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.020. View

2.
Hacker N, Wain G, Nicklin J . Resection of bulky positive lymph nodes in patients with cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995; 5(4):250-256. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05040250.x. View

3.
Rash D, Lee Y, Kashefi A, Durbin-Johnson B, Mathai M, Valicenti R . Clinical response of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenopathy to a radiation boost in the definitive management of locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87(2):317-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2031. View

4.
Gouy S, Morice P, Narducci F, Uzan C, Gilmore J, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H . Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(5):e212-20. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70011-6. View

5.
Brenner D . Dose, volume, and tumor-control predictions in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993; 26(1):171-9. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90189-3. View