» Articles » PMID: 31616447

Induced Expression of Gene Enhances Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Sweet Potato

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2019 Oct 17
PMID 31616447
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drought stress often leads to reduced yields and is a perilous delimiter for expanded cultivation and increased productivity of sweet potato. Cell wall stabilization proteins have been identified to play a pivotal role in mechanical stabilization during desiccation stress mitigation in plants. They are involved in numerous cellular processes that modify cell wall properties to tolerate the mechanical stress during dehydration. This provides a plausible approach to engineer crops for enhanced stable yields under adverse climatic conditions. In this study, we genetically engineered sweet potato cv. Jewel with gene encoding a protein related to cell wall stabilization, isolated from the resurrection plant , under stress-inducible XvPSap1 promoter -mediated transformation. Detection of the transgene by PCR, Southern blot, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed the integration of in the three independent events. Phenotypic evaluation of shoot length, number of leaves, and yield revealed that the transgenic plants grew better than the wild-type plants under drought stress. Assessment of biochemical indices during drought stress showed higher levels of chlorophyll, free proline, and relative water content and decreased lipid peroxidation in transgenic plants than in wild types. Our findings demonstrate that enhances drought tolerance in transgenic sweet potato without causing deleterious phenotypic and yield changes. The transgenic drought-tolerant sweet potato lines provide a valuable resource as a drought-tolerant crop on arid lands of the world.

Citing Articles

Sweet Potato as a Key Crop for Food Security under the Conditions of Global Climate Change: A Review.

Sapakhova Z, Raissova N, Daurov D, Zhapar K, Daurova A, Zhigailov A Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37447081 PMC: 10346279. DOI: 10.3390/plants12132516.


Blocking IbmiR319a Impacts Plant Architecture and Reduces Drought Tolerance in Sweet Potato.

Ren L, Zhang T, Wu H, Ge X, Wan H, Chen S Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35327958 PMC: 8953241. DOI: 10.3390/genes13030404.


Two Decades of Desiccation Biology: A Systematic Review of the Best Studied Angiosperm Resurrection Plants.

Tebele S, Marks R, Farrant J Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(12).

PMID: 34961255 PMC: 8706221. DOI: 10.3390/plants10122784.


Systems biology of resurrection plants.

Gechev T, Lyall R, Petrov V, Bartels D Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021; 78(19-20):6365-6394.

PMID: 34390381 PMC: 8558194. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-021-03913-8.


Dynamics of cell wall structure and related genomic resources for drought tolerance in rice.

Ganie S, Ahammed G Plant Cell Rep. 2021; 40(3):437-459.

PMID: 33389046 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-020-02649-2.


References
1.
Golldack D, Li C, Mohan H, Probst N . Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: Unraveling the signaling networks. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5:151. PMC: 4001066. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00151. View

2.
Mohammadi M, Kav N, Deyholos M . Transcriptional profiling of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots identifies novel, dehydration-responsive genes. Plant Cell Environ. 2007; 30(5):630-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01645.x. View

3.
Rukundo P, Shimelis H, Laing M, Gahakwa D . Combining Ability, Maternal Effects, and Heritability of Drought Tolerance, Yield and Yield Components in Sweetpotato. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 7:1981. PMC: 5222846. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01981. View

4.
Powell T, Wheeler J, de Oliveira A, da Costa A, Saleska S, Meir P . Differences in xylem and leaf hydraulic traits explain differences in drought tolerance among mature Amazon rainforest trees. Glob Chang Biol. 2017; 23(10):4280-4293. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13731. View

5.
Wei A, He C, Li B, Li N, Zhang J . The pyramid of transgenes TsVP and BetA effectively enhances the drought tolerance of maize plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010; 9(2):216-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00548.x. View