» Articles » PMID: 31607922

Transplant Recipients Using Tacrolimus Had Higher Utilization of Healthcare Services Than Those Receiving Cyclosporine in Taiwan

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2019 Oct 15
PMID 31607922
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To date, population-based studies on the healthcare service utilization among stable heart, kidney, and liver transplant recipients with different calcineurin inhibitors are still scarce. Therefore, we used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to conduct a nationwide cross-sectional study to estimate the healthcare utilization of stable transplant recipients with tacrolimus or cyclosporine (n = 3,482). The sampled patients in this study comprised 377 heart, 1,693 kidney, and 1,412 liver transplant recipients between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2011. Each subject was followed for a 1-year period to evaluate his/her healthcare service utilization. Outcome variables of the healthcare service utilization were stated as below: numbers of outpatient visits, outpatient costs, numbers of inpatient days, inpatients costs, and total costs of all healthcare services. As for all healthcare service utilization, stable transplant recipients on tacrolimus had significantly more outpatient visits (40.7 vs. 38.6), outpatient costs (US$10,383 vs. US$8,155), and total costs (US$12,516 vs. US$10,372) of all healthcare services than those on cyclosporine during the 1-year follow-up period. Additionally, further analysis showed that heart transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus incurred 1.7-fold higher inpatient costs compared to patients receiving cyclosporine. We concluded that transplant recipients using tacrolimus had significantly higher utilization of all healthcare services than those receiving cyclosporine as immunosuppressive therapy.

Citing Articles

Effect of Short-Term Tacrolimus Exposure on Rat Liver: An Insight into Serum Antioxidant Status, Liver Lipid Peroxidation, and Inflammation.

Fatima N, Sheikh N, Satoskar A, Akhtar T, Tayyeb A, Ashfaq I Mediators Inflamm. 2021; 2021:6613786.

PMID: 33679236 PMC: 7929660. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6613786.

References
1.
Junior A, Silva G, Andrade E, Cherchiglia M, Costa J, Almeida A . Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus: cost-effectiveness analysis for renal transplantation in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2015; 49:13. PMC: 4386555. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005430. View

2.
Lazzaro C, McKechnie T, McKenna M . Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin in renal transplantation in Italy: cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analyses. J Nephrol. 2002; 15(5):580-8. View

3.
Jurgensen J, Arns W, Hass B . Cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplant recipients in Germany: a model approach. Eur J Health Econ. 2009; 11(1):15-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-009-0148-3. View

4.
James A, Mannon R . The Cost of Transplant Immunosuppressant Therapy: Is This Sustainable?. Curr Transplant Rep. 2015; 2(2):113-121. PMC: 4520417. DOI: 10.1007/s40472-015-0052-y. View

5.
Rodriguez-Serrano M, Sanchez-Lazaro I, Almenar-Bonet L, Martinez-Dolz L, Portoles-Sanz M, Rivera-Otero M . Does the calcineurin inhibitor have influence on cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplantation?. Clin Transplant. 2013; 28(1):88-95. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12282. View