» Articles » PMID: 31605310

Assessing the Additional Surgical Risk of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Oct 13
PMID 31605310
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: There has been a sharp rise in the rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy over the last decade, despite the low incidence of new primary cancers predicted for the contralateral breast. This study compares the postoperative complication rates between the diseased breast treated with mastectomy and the contralateral breast that underwent prophylactic mastectomy, followed by immediate bilateral breast implant reconstruction. We hypothesized that there will be no difference in postoperative outcomes between prophylactic and diseased groups, as the surgical approach would be comparable.

Methods: After IRB approval, a retrospective chart review identified consecutive unilateral breast cancer patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction between May 2008 and May 2018 at a tertiary academic medical center. A paired sample t-test and a penalized logic regression model were constructed to identify relationships between breast laterality and outcomes.

Results: A total of 1117 patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent bilateral mastectomy and immediate breast implant reconstruction were identified. Rates of capsular contracture and infection were significantly greater in the diseased breast, while rates of revision were significantly greater in the contralateral prophylactic breast. There were no statistically significant differences between breasts in rates of explant, skin flap necrosis or hematoma. When adjusted for confounding variables, a higher infection rate was observed in the diseased breast.

Conclusion: This study detected significant differences in postoperative complication rates between the diseased and prophylactic breasts following bilateral mastectomy and immediate breast implant reconstruction. Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the diseased breast compared with low rates of complications in the contralateral prophylactic breast. This information is helpful for preoperative decision making, as surgeons and patients carefully weigh the additional risks of contralateral prophylactic procedure.

Citing Articles

Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.

Singh P, Agnese D, Amin M, Barrio A, van den Bruele A, Burke E Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(2):899-911.

PMID: 39538100 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16484-2.


Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Contralateral Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.

Singh P, Agnese D, Amin M, Barrio A, van den Bruele A, Burke E Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(4):2212-2223.

PMID: 38261126 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14893-x.


Is there an increasing trend of risk-reducing prophylactic mastectomy procedure in preventing breast cancer among women?.

Arslan B, Tazeoglu D, Dag A, Berkesoglu M, Ozdemir A Turk J Surg. 2022; 37(4):347-354.

PMID: 35677477 PMC: 9130946. DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.4963.


Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Saldanha I, Broyles J, Adam G, Cao W, Reddy Bhuma M, Mehta S Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10(3):e4179.

PMID: 35317462 PMC: 8932484. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004179.


Objective photographic assessments and comparisons of immediate bilateral breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and implants.

Han H, Choi J, Eom J Arch Plast Surg. 2021; 48(5):473-482.

PMID: 34583431 PMC: 8490115. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2020.02362.