» Articles » PMID: 31603696

Tygerberg Research Ubuntu-Inspired Community Engagement Model: Integrating Community Engagement into Genomic Biobanking

Overview
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Oct 12
PMID 31603696
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Community engagement (CE) is an ethical imperative in research, but the knowledge base for what constitutes effective and ethically sound CE is limited. Ubuntu, as a component of responsive communitarianism where communal welfare is valued together with individual autonomy, is useful in furthering our understanding of effective CE and how it could best be achieved. Similarly, a relative solidarity model serves as a compromise between extreme individualism and extreme communalism and is more appropriate in a heterogenous African context. Approaching CE from an Ubuntu philosophical perspective in southern Africa is particularly important in genomic biobanking, given the implications for individuals, families, and communities. CE is often implemented in a tokenistic manner as an ancillary component of research. Understanding consent information is challenging where genomic biobanking is concerned due to scientific complexity. We started a process of CE around genomic biobanking and conducted empirical research in an attempt to develop a model to promote effective and ethically sound CE, using relative solidarity to create a nuanced application of Ubuntu. The TRUCE model is an eight-step model that uses social mapping to identify potential communities, establishes the scope of CE, and requires that communities are approached early. Co-creation strategies for CE are encouraged and co-ownership of knowledge production is emphasized. Recruiting and engaging communities at each stage of research is necessary. Evaluation and adaptation of CE strategies are included. Discussion and dissemination of results after the research is completed are encouraged. There is a significant gap between the theory of CE and its authentic application to research in Africa. This Ubuntu-inspired model facilitates bridging that gap and is particularly suited to genomic biobanking. The CE model enhances and complements the consent process and should be integrated into research as a funding and regulatory requirement where applicable.

Citing Articles

Science and Society: Pathways to Equitable Access and Delivery of Genomics Medicine in Africa.

Munung N Curr Genet Med Rep. 2025; 13(1):1.

PMID: 40012965 PMC: 11850555. DOI: 10.1007/s40142-024-00211-0.


The Ubuntu Way: Ensuring Ethical AI Integration in Health Research.

Odero B, Nderitu D, Samuel G Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 9:625.

PMID: 39606617 PMC: 11599802. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23021.1.


Revisiting community engagement methods in the context of data science research and big data use in South Africa.

Nair G, Burgess T, Obasa A, Kling S, Singh S S Afr J Sci. 2024; 119(5-6).

PMID: 39328372 PMC: 11426191. DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2023/14723.


Engaging publics in biobanking and genetic research governance - a literature review towards informing practice in India.

Warrier P, Ho C, Bull S, Vaz M, Vaz M Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 6:5.

PMID: 38645686 PMC: 11026954. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16558.2.


Digital tools for youth health promotion: principles, policies and practices in sub-Saharan Africa.

Ferretti A, Adjei K, Ali J, Atuire C, Ayuk B, Banougnin B Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(2).

PMID: 38558241 PMC: 10983781. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae030.


References
1.
Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R . The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011; 27(4):391-9. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462311000481. View

2.
Staunton C, Moodley K . Challenges in biobank governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14:35. PMC: 3849982. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-35. View

3.
Campbell M, Susser E, de Vries J, Baldinger A, Sibeko G, Mndini M . Exploring researchers' experiences of working with a researcher-driven, population-specific community advisory board in a South African schizophrenia genomics study. BMC Med Ethics. 2015; 16:45. PMC: 4487967. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0037-5. View

4.
Celi L, Ippolito A, Montgomery R, Moses C, Stone D . Crowdsourcing knowledge discovery and innovations in medicine. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(9):e216. PMC: 4180345. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3761. View

5.
Wazny K, Chan K . Identifying potential uses of crowdsourcing in global health, conflict, and humanitarian settings: an adapted CHNRI (Child Health and Nutrition Initiative) exercise. J Glob Health. 2018; 8(2):020704. PMC: 6220355. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.020704. View