» Articles » PMID: 31601897

DNA-PKcs and ATM Epistatically Suppress DNA End Resection and Hyperactivation of ATR-dependent G-checkpoint in S-phase Irradiated Cells

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Oct 12
PMID 31601897
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We previously reported that cells exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation (IR) in the G-phase of the cell cycle activate a checkpoint that is epistatically regulated by ATM and ATR operating as an integrated module. In this module, ATR interphases exclusively with the cell cycle to implement the checkpoint, mainly using CHK1. The ATM/ATR module similarly regulates DNA end-resection at low IR-doses. Strikingly, at high IR-doses, the ATM/ATR coupling relaxes and each kinase exerts independent contributions to resection and the G-checkpoint. DNA-PKcs links to the ATM/ATR module and defects cause hyper-resection and hyperactivation of G-checkpoint at all doses examined. Surprisingly, our present report reveals that cells irradiated in S-phase utilize a different form of wiring between DNA-PKcs/ATM/ATR: The checkpoint activated in G-phase is regulated exclusively by ATR/CHK1; similarly at high and low IR-doses. DNA end-resection supports ATR-activation, but inhibition of ATR leaves resection unchanged. DNA-PKcs and ATM link now epistatically to resection and their inhibition causes hyper-resection and ATR-dependent G-checkpoint hyperactivation at all IR-doses. We propose that DNA-PKcs, ATM and ATR form a modular unit to regulate DSB processing with their crosstalk distinctly organized in S- and G- phase, with strong dependence on DSB load only in G-phase.

Citing Articles

Reversing regulatory safeguards: Targeting the ATR pathway to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance.

Lin X, Qiu Y, Soni A, Stuschke M, Iliakis G Mol Ther Oncol. 2025; 33(1):200934.

PMID: 39968096 PMC: 11834088. DOI: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.200934.


Key molecular DNA damage responses of human cells to radiation.

Zhang C, Liu J, Wu J, Ranjan K, Cui X, Wang X Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1422520.

PMID: 39050891 PMC: 11266142. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1422520.


A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.

Rajpurohit Y, Sharma D, Lal M, Soni I J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150(5):226.

PMID: 38696003 PMC: 11065934. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05757-8.


New Facets of DNA Double Strand Break Repair: Radiation Dose as Key Determinant of HR versus c-NHEJ Engagement.

Mladenov E, Mladenova V, Stuschke M, Iliakis G Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(19).

PMID: 37834403 PMC: 10573367. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914956.


Chemical Inhibition of RPA by HAMNO Alters Cell Cycle Dynamics by Impeding DNA Replication and G2-to-M Transition but Has Little Effect on the Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Response.

Dueva R, Krieger L, Li F, Luo D, Xiao H, Stuschke M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(19).

PMID: 37834389 PMC: 10573259. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914941.


References
1.
Adams K, Medhurst A, Dart D, Lakin N . Recruitment of ATR to sites of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage requires ATM and components of the MRN protein complex. Oncogene. 2006; 25(28):3894-904. PMC: 1852851. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209426. View

2.
Blackford A, Jackson S . ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response. Mol Cell. 2017; 66(6):801-817. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015. View

3.
Saldivar J, Hamperl S, Bocek M, Chung M, Bass T, Cisneros-Soberanis F . An intrinsic S/G checkpoint enforced by ATR. Science. 2018; 361(6404):806-810. PMC: 6365305. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9346. View

4.
You Z, Yee M, Newport J, Cimprich K . Xenopus ATR is a replication-dependent chromatin-binding protein required for the DNA replication checkpoint. Curr Biol. 2001; 10(24):1565-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00855-1. View

5.
Cordell H . Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2002; 11(20):2463-8. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/11.20.2463. View