» Articles » PMID: 31600254

Relationship Between Feed Efficiency Indexes and Performance, Body Measurements, Digestibility, Energy Partitioning, and Nitrogen Partitioning in Pre-weaning Dairy Heifers

Abstract

The objectives of this study were: 1) to classify animals into groups of high and low feed efficiency using two feed efficiency indexes (Residual feed intake (RFI) and residual feed intake and body weight gain (RIG)), and 2) to evaluate if pre-weaning heifer calves divergent for feed efficiency indexes exhibit differences in performance, body measurements, digestibility, energy partitioning, and nitrogen partitioning. A total of 32 Gyr heifer calves were enrolled in a 63-d trial and classified into two feed efficiency (FE) groups based on RFI and RIG (mean ± 0.5 SD). The groups were classified as high efficiency (HE) RFI (HE RFI, n = 9; HE RIG, n = 10), and low efficiency (LE) RFI (LE RFI, n = 10; LE RIG, n = 11). The remaining animals were classified as intermediate (n = 13 (RFI) and n = 11 (RIG)). HE and LE calves had RFI values of-0.052 and 0.049 kg/d (P < 0.05), respectively. The HE RFI group consumed 8.9% less solid diet than the LE RFI group. HE RFI animals exhibited an increased digestibility of crude protein and ether extract and tended to have greater total dry and organic matter digestibility. LE RFI animals had greater gross energy and nitrogen intake, though greater fecal losses resulted in a tendency to reduce energy and nitrogen use efficiency. HE and LE calves had RIG values of 0.080 and -0.077kg/d (P ≤ 0.01), respectively. HE RIG animals exhibited greater average daily gain (9.4%), body weight (BW), and heart girth, though HE RIG group exhibited narrower hip width. HE RIG animals tended to have greater ether extract digestibility but greater methane losses (% of gross energy). HE RFI in pre-weaning heifers seems to be related to differences in digestibility. Divergent animals for RIG during the assessed phase appear to differ in body measurements, which may be related to differences in the composition of the gain.

Citing Articles

Residual Feed Intake as an Efficiency Metric for Pre-Weaning Dairy Calves: What Do We Know?.

da Silva C, Leao J, Lage C, Coelho S, Campos M Life (Basel). 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37629582 PMC: 10455359. DOI: 10.3390/life13081727.


Evaluating differences between formulated dietary net energy values and net energy values determined from growth performance in finishing beef steers.

Galyean M, Hales K, Smith Z J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 37422728 PMC: 10355367. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad230.


Common and diet-specific metabolic pathways underlying residual feed intake in fattening Charolais yearling bulls.

Jorge-Smeding E, Bonnet M, Renand G, Taussat S, Graulet B, Ortigues-Marty I Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):24346.

PMID: 34934071 PMC: 8692463. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03678-x.


Grouping crossbred Holstein x Gyr heifers according to different feed efficiency indexes and its effects on energy and nitrogen partitioning, blood metabolic variables and gas exchanges.

Silva D, Pereira L, Lima J, Machado F, Ferreira A, Tomich T PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238419.

PMID: 32915803 PMC: 7485853. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238419.


Relationship between feed efficiency indexes and thermography, blood, and ruminal parameters in pre-weaning dairy heifers.

Lage C, Coelho S, Diniz Neto H, Malacco V, Rodrigues J, Sacramento J PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0236118.

PMID: 32667943 PMC: 7363088. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236118.


References
1.
Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, Abo-Ismail M, Carstens G, Guan L, Hegarty R, Kenny D . Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle. Animal. 2018; 12(s2):s321-s335. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118001489. View

2.
Sawa A, Bogucki M, Krezel-Czopek S, Neja W . Relationship between Conformation Traits and Lifetime Production Efficiency of Cows. ISRN Vet Sci. 2013; 2013:124690. PMC: 3710600. DOI: 10.1155/2013/124690. View

3.
Vigors S, Sweeney T, OShea C, Kelly A, ODoherty J . Pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency, differ in intestinal enzyme and nutrient transporter gene expression, nutrient digestibility and microbial activity. Animal. 2016; 10(11):1848-1855. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116000847. View

4.
Herd R, Arthur P . Physiological basis for residual feed intake. J Anim Sci. 2008; 87(14 Suppl):E64-71. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1345. View

5.
Harris A, Patience J, Lonergan S, J M Dekkers C, Gabler N . Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake. J Anim Sci. 2013; 90 Suppl 4:164-6. DOI: 10.2527/jas.53855. View