» Articles » PMID: 31589243

The Evolutionary History of Ephs and Ephrins: Toward Multicellular Organisms

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Oct 8
PMID 31589243
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eph receptor (Eph) and ephrin signaling regulate fundamental developmental processes through both forward and reverse signaling triggered upon cell-cell contact. In vertebrates, they are both classified into classes A and B, and some representatives have been identified in many metazoan groups, where their expression and functions have been well studied. We have extended previous phylogenetic analyses and examined the presence of Eph and ephrins in the tree of life to determine their origin and evolution. We have found that 1) premetazoan choanoflagellates may already have rudimental Eph/ephrin signaling as they have an Eph-/ephrin-like pair and homologs of downstream-signaling genes; 2) both forward- and reverse-downstream signaling might already occur in Porifera since sponges have most genes involved in these types of signaling; 3) the nonvertebrate metazoan Eph is a type-B receptor that can bind ephrins regardless of their membrane-anchoring structure, glycosylphosphatidylinositol, or transmembrane; 4) Eph/ephrin cross-class binding is specific to Gnathostomata; and 5) kinase-dead Eph receptors can be traced back to Gnathostomata. We conclude that Eph/ephrin signaling is of older origin than previously believed. We also examined the presence of protein domains associated with functional characteristics and the appearance and conservation of downstream-signaling pathways to understand the original and derived functions of Ephs and ephrins. We find that the evolutionary history of these gene families points to an ancestral function in cell-cell interactions that could contribute to the emergence of multicellularity and, in particular, to the required segregation of cell populations.

Citing Articles

EFNA4 deletion suppresses the migration, invasion, stemness, and angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells through the inactivation of Pygo2/Wnt signaling.

Wang X, Zhang T, Yu R Histol Histopathol. 2024; 40(3):343-356.

PMID: 38953488 DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-779.


Differential expansion and retention patterns of LRR-RLK genes across plant evolution.

Kileeg Z, Haldar A, Khan H, Qamar A, Mott G Plant Direct. 2023; 7(12):e556.

PMID: 38145254 PMC: 10739070. DOI: 10.1002/pld3.556.


The mechanism of high mobility group box-1 protein and its bidirectional regulation in tumors.

Tian Z, Zhu L, Xie Y, Hu H, Ren Q, Liu J Biomol Biomed. 2023; 24(3):477-485.

PMID: 37897664 PMC: 11088895. DOI: 10.17305/bb.2023.9760.


Cross-phyla protein annotation by structural prediction and alignment.

Ruperti F, Papadopoulos N, Musser J, Mirdita M, Steinegger M, Arendt D Genome Biol. 2023; 24(1):113.

PMID: 37173746 PMC: 10176882. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-02942-9.


Ephrin-Eph receptor tyrosine kinases for potential therapeutics against hepatic pathologies.

Mekala S, Dugam P, Das A J Cell Commun Signal. 2023; 17(3):549-561.

PMID: 37103689 PMC: 10409970. DOI: 10.1007/s12079-023-00750-1.


References
1.
Wilkinson D . Regulation of cell differentiation by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling. Cell Adh Migr. 2014; 8(4):339-48. PMC: 4594526. DOI: 10.4161/19336918.2014.970007. View

2.
Cheng H, Govindan J, Greenstein D . Regulated trafficking of the MSP/Eph receptor during oocyte meiotic maturation in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(10):705-714. PMC: 2613949. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.043. View

3.
Dearborn Jr R, He Q, Kunes S, Dai Y . Eph receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated formation of a topographic map in the Drosophila visual system. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(4):1338-49. PMC: 6757577. View

4.
Chen Y, Fu A, Ip N . Eph receptors at synapses: implications in neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Signal. 2011; 24(3):606-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.11.016. View

5.
Murai K, Pasquale E . 'Eph'ective signaling: forward, reverse and crosstalk. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116(Pt 14):2823-32. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00625. View