» Articles » PMID: 31588824

How to Pick Out the "Unreal" Gleason 3 + 3 Patients: A Nomogram for More Precise Active Surveillance Protocol in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in a Chinese Population

Overview
Journal J Invest Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Oct 8
PMID 31588824
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a nomogram for selecting the "unreal" Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 patients in biopsy GS 3 + 3 prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

Methods: Patients who were newly diagnosed with PCa by biopsy and underwent radical prostatectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2009 to October 2018 were enrolled. Comparisons were made between GS 3 + 3 and higher grade PCa patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for the "unreal" GS 3 + 3 PCa in biopsy GS 3 + 3 patients. Then, a nomogram was developed to predict the probability of "unreal" GS 3 + 3 PCa according to the results of multivariate analysis. Finally, receiver operating characteristic and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were structured to identify the efficiency of the predictive model.

Results: Compared to higher GS grade, biopsy GS 3 + 3 had greater upgrade risk ( < 0.05) while a lower proportion of positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, extra-prostatic extension, lymph node invasion, and nerve invasion (all  < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age, PSAD, prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and biopsy positive cores were significant risk factors for "unreal" GS 3 + 3. A nomogram was developed utilizing these factors with high prediction performance (area under curve = 0.924). Furthermore, DCA curve suggested that this predictive model was effective.

Conclusions: The nomogram identified the probability of "unreal" GS 3 + 3 PCa in biopsy GS 3 + 3 PCa patients, which was of great value for clinical guidance in low risk PCa therapy.

Citing Articles

Prognostic significance of surgery and radiotherapy in elderly patients with localized prostate cancer: establishing and time-based external validation a nomogram from SEER-based study.

Zhanghuang C, Zhu J, Li Y, Wang J, Ma J, Li L BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):12.

PMID: 38184526 PMC: 10771675. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01384-6.


A high high-density lipoprotein level is associated with Gleason score upgrade in Chinese patients diagnosed with high-grade prostate carcinoma.

Lyu J, Li L, Jiang T, Wang Z, Zhu Y BMC Urol. 2023; 23(1):8.

PMID: 36627638 PMC: 9830723. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01155-9.


CRMP4 CpG Hypermethylation Predicts Upgrading to Gleason Score ≥ 8 in Prostate Cancer.

Qin X, Lu Q, Yang C, Wang J, Chen J, Liu K Front Oncol. 2022; 12:840950.

PMID: 35359369 PMC: 8960729. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.840950.


Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models.

Liu H, Tang K, Peng E, Wang L, Xia D, Chen Z Cancer Manag Res. 2020; 12:13099-13110.

PMID: 33376402 PMC: 7765752. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S286167.


The Impact of Prostate Cancer Upgrading and Upstaging on Biochemical Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Survival.

Bakavicius A, Drevinskaite M, Daniunaite K, Barisiene M, Jarmalaite S, Jankevicius F Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(2).

PMID: 32033148 PMC: 7074013. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56020061.