» Articles » PMID: 31588416

A Roadmap to Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Overview
Date 2019 Oct 8
PMID 31588416
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common childhood form of muscular dystrophy, with an estimated frequency of 1:5000 live births. The impact of the disease presents as early as infancy with significant developmental delays, and ultimately loss of ambulation and respiratory insufficiency. Glucocorticoids are the only pharmacological agents known to alter the natural progression of the disease by prolonging ambulation, reducing scoliosis, and assisted ventilation. Introduction of therapy at an early age may halt the muscle pathology in DMD. In anticipation of the potentially disease-modifying products that are reaching regulatory review, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy (PPMD) formally initiated a national Duchenne Newborn Screening (DNBS) effort in December 2014 to build public health infrastructure for newborn screening (NBS) for Duchenne in the United States. The effort includes a formalized national Duchenne Newborn Screening Steering Committee, six related Working Groups, a Duchenne Screening Test Development Project led by PerkinElmer, a program with the American College of Medical Genetic and Genomics' Newborn Screening Translation Research Network (NBSTRN), and collaborations with other Duchenne partners and federal agencies involved in NBS. We herein review the organization and effort of the U.S. DNBS program to develop the evidence supporting the implementation of NBS for DMD.

Citing Articles

Newborn Screening for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Farrar M, Kariyawasam D, Grattan S, Bayley K, Davis M, Holland S J Neuromuscul Dis. 2022; 10(1):15-28.

PMID: 36373292 PMC: 9881031. DOI: 10.3233/JND-221535.


Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: First Year Results of a Population-Based Pilot.

Hartnett M, Lloyd-Puryear M, Tavakoli N, Wynn J, Koval-Burt C, Gruber D Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022; 8(4).

PMID: 36278620 PMC: 9589949. DOI: 10.3390/ijns8040050.


Duchenne expert physician perspectives on Duchenne newborn screening and early Duchenne care.

Armstrong N, Schrader R, Fischer R, Crossnohere N Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2022; 190(2):162-168.

PMID: 35932090 PMC: 9804401. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31993.


Time to diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy remains unchanged: Findings from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network, 2000-2015.

Thomas S, Conway K, Fapo O, Street N, Mathews K, Mann J Muscle Nerve. 2022; 66(2):193-197.

PMID: 35312090 PMC: 9308714. DOI: 10.1002/mus.27532.


Implementation of Hospital-Based Supplemental Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening (sDMDNBS): A Pathway to Broadening Adoption.

Parad R, Sheldon Y, Bhattacharjee A Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021; 7(4).

PMID: 34842620 PMC: 8629008. DOI: 10.3390/ijns7040077.


References
1.
Mendell J, Lloyd-Puryear M . Report of MDA muscle disease symposium on newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2013; 48(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1002/mus.23810. View

2.
Gatheridge M, Kwon J, Mendell J, Scheuerbrandt G, Moat S, Eyskens F . Identifying Non-Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy-Positive and False Negative Results in Prior Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening Programs: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2015; 73(1):111-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3537. View

3.
Aartsma-Rus A, van Ommen G . Antisense-mediated exon skipping: a versatile tool with therapeutic and research applications. RNA. 2007; 13(10):1609-24. PMC: 1986821. DOI: 10.1261/rna.653607. View

4.
Wang R, Silverstein Fadlon C, Ulm J, Jankovic I, Eskin A, Lu A . Online self-report data for duchenne muscular dystrophy confirms natural history and can be used to assess for therapeutic benefits. PLoS Curr. 2015; 6. PMC: 4207635. DOI: 10.1371/currents.md.e1e8f2be7c949f9ffe81ec6fca1cce6a. View

5.
. Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system--executive summary. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(5 Pt 2):S296-307. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633I. View