» Articles » PMID: 31587090

Personalised Warfarin Dosing in Children Post-cardiac Surgery

Overview
Journal Pediatr Cardiol
Date 2019 Oct 7
PMID 31587090
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Warfarin dosing is challenging due to a multitude of factors affecting its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). A novel personalised dosing algorithm predicated on a warfarin PK/PD model and incorporating CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype information has been developed for children. The present prospective, observational study aimed to compare the model with conventional weight-based dosing. The study involved two groups of children post-cardiac surgery: Group 1 were warfarin naïve, in whom loading and maintenance doses were estimated using the model over a 6-month duration and compared to historical case-matched controls. Group 2 were already established on maintenance therapy and randomised into a crossover study comparing the model with conventional maintenance dosing, over a 12-month period. Five patients enrolled in Group 1. Compared to the control group, the median time to achieve the first therapeutic INR was longer (5 vs. 2 days), to stable anticoagulation was shorter (29.0 vs. 96.5 days), to over-anticoagulation was longer (15.0 vs. 4.0 days). In addition, median percentage of INRs within the target range (%ITR) and percentage of time in therapeutic range (%TTR) was higher; 70% versus 47.4% and 83.4% versus 62.3%, respectively. Group 2 included 26 patients. No significant differences in INR control were found between model and conventional dosing phases; mean %ITR was 68.82% versus 67.9% (p = 0.84) and mean %TTR was 85.47% versus 80.2% (p = 0.09), respectively. The results suggest model-based dosing can improve anticoagulation control, particularly when initiating and stabilising warfarin dosing. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Citing Articles

Impact of Pharmacogenomics in Clinical Practice.

Principi N, Petropulacos K, Esposito S Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(11).

PMID: 38004461 PMC: 10675377. DOI: 10.3390/ph16111596.


Application of a warfarin dosing calculator to guide individualized dosing empirical adjustment after fixed dosing: a pilot study.

Cai X, Chen J, Chen M, Xia X, Fang G, Zhang J Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1235331.

PMID: 37663245 PMC: 10469691. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1235331.


Ethnic Diversity and Warfarin Pharmacogenomics.

Asiimwe I, Pirmohamed M Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:866058.

PMID: 35444556 PMC: 9014219. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.866058.


Comparing Two Methods of Tablet Manipulation to Adjust the Warfarin Dose in Paediatric Care.

Brustugun J, Birkedal Aas E, Tho I, Bjerknes K Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(4).

PMID: 32325777 PMC: 7238213. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040375.

References
1.
Tabib A, Najibi B, Dalili M, Baghaei R, Poopak B . Enzyme Polymorphism in Warfarin Dose Management After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2015; 4(3):e27963. PMC: 4592525. DOI: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.27963v2. View

2.
Shaw K, Amstutz U, Hildebrand C, Rassekh S, Hosking M, Neville K . VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes are predictors of warfarin-related outcomes in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014; 61(6):1055-62. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24932. View

3.
Pirmohamed M, Burnside G, Eriksson N, Jorgensen A, Toh C, Nicholson T . A randomized trial of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(24):2294-303. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311386. View

4.
Perlstein T, Goldhaber S, Nelson K, Joshi V, Morgan T, Lesko L . The Creating an Optimal Warfarin Nomogram (CROWN) Study. Thromb Haemost. 2011; 107(1):59-68. PMC: 4133142. DOI: 10.1160/TH11-08-0568. View

5.
Jones S, McLoughlin S, Piovesan D, Savoia H, Monagle P, Newall F . Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Home and Hospital Warfarin Management Within a Pediatric Anticoagulation Clinic. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016; 38(3):216-20. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000502. View