» Articles » PMID: 31581658

How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Oct 5
PMID 31581658
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Until now, most research has focused on the development of indicators of negative welfare, and relatively few studies provide information on valid, reliable, and feasible indicators addressing positive aspects of animal welfare. However, a lack of suffering does not guarantee that animals are experiencing a positive welfare state. The aim of the present review is to identify promising valid and reliable animal-based indicators for the assessment of positive welfare that might be included in welfare assessment protocols for ruminants, and to discuss them in the light of the five domains model, highlighting possible gaps to be filled by future research. Based on the existing literature in the main databases, each indicator was evaluated in terms of its validity, reliability, and on-farm feasibility. Some valid indicators were identified, but a lot of the validity evidence is based on their absence when a negative situation is present; furthermore, only a few indicators are available in the domains of Nutrition and Health. Reliability has been seldom addressed. On-farm feasibility could be increased by developing specific sampling strategies and/or relying on the use of video- or automatic-recording devices. In conclusion, several indicators are potentially available (e.g., synchronisation of lying and feeding, coat or fleece condition, qualitative behaviour assessment), but further research is required.

Citing Articles

Enhancing movement opportunity to support behavioral needs for movement-restricted cattle through different conditions of access to exercise.

Cellier M, Shepley E, Aigueperse N, Robichaud M, Vasseur E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5917.

PMID: 39966456 PMC: 11836272. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89891-4.


A systematic review on the application of precision livestock farming technologies to detect lying, rest and sleep behavior in dairy calves.

Pesenti Rossi G, Dalla Costa E, Barbieri S, Minero M, Canali E Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11:1477731.

PMID: 39764367 PMC: 11701058. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1477731.


Discourses on Positive Animal Welfare by Sheep Farmers and Industry Actors: Implications for Science and Communication.

Muhammad M, Stokes J, Manning L, Huang I Vet Sci. 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39453044 PMC: 11511421. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11100452.


Novel enrichment reduces boredom-associated behaviors in housed dairy cows.

Russell A, Randall L, Eyre N, Kaler J, Green M JDS Commun. 2024; 5(5):452-456.

PMID: 39310844 PMC: 11410499. DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0475.


Exploring positive welfare measures: preliminary findings from a prototype protocol in loose housing dairy cattle farms.

Mattiello S, Celozzi S, Soli F, Battini M Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1368363.

PMID: 38993280 PMC: 11238295. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1368363.


References
1.
Lidfors L . The use of getting up and lying down movements in the evaluation of cattle environments. Vet Res Commun. 1989; 13(4):307-24. DOI: 10.1007/BF00420838. View

2.
Lin J, Amodeo L, Arthurs J, Reilly S . Taste neophobia and palatability: the pleasure of drinking. Physiol Behav. 2012; 106(4):515-9. PMC: 3348963. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.029. View

3.
Vigors B . Citizens' and Farmers' Framing of 'Positive Animal Welfare' and the Implications for Framing Positive Welfare in Communication. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(4). PMC: 6523948. DOI: 10.3390/ani9040147. View

4.
Arnott G, Ferris C, OConnell N . Review: welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems. Animal. 2016; 11(2):261-273. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116001336. View

5.
Ninomiya S . Grooming Device Effects on Behaviour and Welfare of Japanese Black Fattening Cattle. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(4). PMC: 6523527. DOI: 10.3390/ani9040186. View