» Articles » PMID: 31577797

Impact of Group Antenatal Care (G-ANC) Versus Individual Antenatal Care (ANC) on Quality of Care, ANC Attendance and Facility-based Delivery: A Pragmatic Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial in Kenya and Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Low quality and frequency of antenatal care (ANC) are associated with lower uptake of facility-based deliveries-a key intervention to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. We implemented group ANC (G-ANC), an alternative service delivery model, in Kenya and Nigeria, to assess its impact on quality and attendance at ANC and uptake of facility-based delivery.

Methods: From October 2016‒January 2018, we conducted a facility-based, pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial with 20 clusters per country. We recruited women <24 weeks gestation during their first ANC visit and enrolled women at intervention facilities who agreed to attend G-ANC in lieu of routine individual ANC. The G-ANC model consisted of five monthly 2-hour meetings with clinical assessments alongside structured gestationally specific group discussions and activities. Quality of care was defined as receipt of eight specific ANC interventions. Data were obtained through facility records and self-report during a home-based postpartum survey. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Findings: All women who completed follow up are included in the analysis (Nigeria: 1018/1075 enrolled women [94.7%], Kenya: 826/1013 [81.5%]). In Nigeria women in the intervention arm were more likely to have a facility-based delivery compared to those in the control arm (Nigeria: 76.7% [391/510] versus 54.1% [275/508]; aOR 2.30, CI 1.51-3.49). In both countries women in the intervention arm were more likely than those in the control arm to receive quality ANC (Nigeria: aOR 5.8, CI 1.98-17.21, p<0.001; Kenya: aOR 5.08, CI 2.31-11.16, p<0.001) and to attend at least four ANC visits (Nigeria: aOR 13.30, CI 7.69-22.99, p<0.001; Kenya: aOR 7.12, CI 3.91-12.97, p<0.001).

Conclusions: G-ANC was associated with higher facility-based delivery rates in Nigeria, where those rates associated with individual ANC were low. In both Kenya and Nigeria it was associated with a higher proportion of women receiving quality ANC and higher frequency of ANC visits.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Group Antenatal Care at the health post level on continuation in antenatal care and facility based delivery in Ethiopia using a cluster randomized stepped-wedge design: Study protocol.

Yallew W, Fasil R, Berhanu D, Wolde K, Teshite D, Sethi R Gates Open Res. 2025; 8:29.

PMID: 39936142 PMC: 11813170. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.15190.1.


Interventions to Enhance Facility Deliveries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Nishimura E, Ochiai K, Ota E Matern Child Health J. 2024; 29(1):31-47.

PMID: 39643854 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-024-04032-z.


Implementation and Baseline Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Group Antenatal Care Program in Two Nigerian States.

Evans W, Ochu C, Bingenheimer J, Adebayo S, David F, Gar S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(11).

PMID: 39595728 PMC: 11593366. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21111461.


The impact of group antenatal care on newborns: Results of a cluster randomized control trial in Eastern Region, Ghana.

Apetorgbor V, Awini E, Ghosh B, Zielinski R, Amankwah G, Kukula V BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):747.

PMID: 39558280 PMC: 11572523. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-05225-9.


Effect of group antenatal care versus individualized antenatal care on birth preparedness and complication readiness: a cluster randomized controlled study among pregnant women in Eastern Region of Ghana.

Kukula V, Awini E, Ghosh B, Apetorgbor V, Zielinski R, Amankwah G BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):546.

PMID: 39152408 PMC: 11328422. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06743-1.


References
1.
de Masi S, Bucagu M, Tuncalp O, Pena-Rosas J, Lawrie T, Oladapo O . Integrated Person-Centered Health Care for All Women During Pregnancy: Implementing World Health Organization Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017; 5(2):197-201. PMC: 5487083. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00141. View

2.
Miltenburg A, Roggeveen Y, Shields L, van Elteren M, van Roosmalen J, Stekelenburg J . Impact of Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness Interventions on Birth with a Skilled Attendant: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0143382. PMC: 4658103. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143382. View

3.
Simkhada B, van Teijlingen E, Porter M, Simkhada P . Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 61(3):244-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04532.x. View

4.
Benova L, Tuncalp O, Moran A, Campbell O . Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3(2):e000779. PMC: 5898334. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000779. View

5.
Moyer C, Mustafa A . Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2013; 10:40. PMC: 3751820. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-40. View