» Articles » PMID: 31576061

Utilising Genetically-Informed Research Designs to Better Understand Family Processes and Child Development: Implications for Adoption and Foster Care Focused Interventions

Overview
Journal Adopt Foster
Date 2019 Oct 3
PMID 31576061
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the interplay between genetic factors and family environmental processes (e.g., inter-parental relationship quality, positive versus negative parenting practices) and children's mental health (e.g., anxiety, depression, conduct problems, ADHD) in the contexts of adoption and foster-care research and practice is critical for effective prevention and intervention programme development. Whilst evidence highlights the importance of family environmental processes for the mental health and well-being of children in adoption and foster care, there is relatively limited evidence of effective interventions specifically for these families. Additionally, family-based interventions not specific to the context of adoption and foster-care typically show small to medium effects, and even where interventions are efficacious, not all children benefit. One explanation for why interventions may not work well for some is that responses to intervention may be influenced by an individual's genetic make-up. This paper summarises how genetically-informed research designs can help disentangle genetic from environmental processes underlying psychopathology outcomes for children, and how this evidence can provide improved insights into the development of more effective preventative intervention targets for adoption and foster-care families. We discuss current difficulties in translating behavioural genetics research to prevention science, and provide recommendations to bridge the gap between behavioural genetics research and prevention science, with lessons for adoption and foster-care research and practice.

Citing Articles

Polygenic and environmental determinants of tics in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Abdulkadir M, Tischfield J, Heiman G, Hoekstra P, Dietrich A Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2022; 192(5-6):73-84.

PMID: 36479979 PMC: 10247895. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32924.

References
1.
Sorensen T, Price R, Stunkard A, SCHULSINGER F . Genetics of obesity in adult adoptees and their biological siblings. BMJ. 1989; 298(6666):87-90. PMC: 1835397. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.298.6666.87. View

2.
OConnor T, Deater-Deckard K, Fulker D, Rutter M, Plomin R . Genotype-environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Dev Psychol. 1998; 34(5):970-81. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.970. View

3.
Hajal N, Neiderhiser J, Moore G, Leve L, Shaw D, Harold G . Angry responses to infant challenges: parent, marital, and child genetic factors associated with harsh parenting. Child Dev. 2015; 86(1):80-93. PMC: 4331203. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12345. View

4.
Jaffee S, Caspi A, Moffitt T, Dodge K, Rutter M, Taylor A . Nature X nurture: genetic vulnerabilities interact with physical maltreatment to promote conduct problems. Dev Psychopathol. 2005; 17(1):67-84. PMC: 2768347. DOI: 10.1017/s0954579405050042. View

5.
Collins F, Varmus H . A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(9):793-5. PMC: 5101938. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. View