» Articles » PMID: 31575998

Comparison of Combined Compression and Surgery with High Ligation-endovenous Laser Ablation-foam Sclerotherapy with Compression Alone for Active Venous Leg Ulcers

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Oct 3
PMID 31575998
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We aimed to assess the ulcer healing time and recurrence rates after treatment with compression therapy (CT) with or without high ligation-endovenous laser ablation-foam sclerotherapy (HL-EVLA-FS) in people with active venous leg ulcers (VLUs). A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 350 patients with active VLUs treated by compression with or without HL-EVLA-FS in our hospital from 2013 to 2017. The primary outcome was the ulcer healing time; secondary outcomes were the 12-month recurrence rates, the relationship between recurrence and venous reflux, and the complications of the two treatments. In total, 193 patients (200 limbs) underwent compression plus HL-EVLA-FS, and 157 patients (177 limbs) underwent CT alone. The ulcer healing time was shorter in the compression plus HL-EVLA-FS group than in the CT alone group (Hazard Ratio [HR] for ulcer healing, 1.845 [95% CI, 1.474-2.309], P = 0.0001). The 12-month ulcer recurrence rates were significantly reduced in the compression plus HL-EVLA-FS group (HR for ulcer recurrence, 0.418 [95% CI, 0.258-0.677], P = 0.0001). Calf perforator vein reflux (CPVR) and isolated superficial venous reflux (ISVR) were risk factors for ulcer recurrence. The combined operation with CT resulted in faster healing of VLUs, a lower ulcer recurrence rate and lower VCSS values after intervention than CT alone.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the effect of combination therapies in the treatment of large varicose ulcers: A real-world cohort study.

Wen F, Xie H, Lai M, Zheng G, Xie Y, Liu X Sci Prog. 2024; 107(3):368504241283352.

PMID: 39290042 PMC: 11418253. DOI: 10.1177/00368504241283352.


Daily Duration of Compression Treatment in Chronic Venous Disease Patients: A Systematic Review.

Mirakhmedova S, Amirkhanov A, Seliverstov E, Efremova O, Zolotukhin I J Pers Med. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37763085 PMC: 10533179. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13091316.

References
1.
Ashby R, Gabe R, Ali S, Adderley U, Bland J, Cullum N . Clinical and cost-effectiveness of compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 383(9920):871-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62368-5. View

2.
Passman M, McLafferty R, Lentz M, Nagre S, Iafrati M, Bohannon W . Validation of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) with other venous severity assessment tools from the American Venous Forum, National Venous Screening Program. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54(6 Suppl):2S-9S. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.117. View

3.
Zhang X, Wang X, Gao C, Qin J, Zhao H, Li W . A 1470-nm laser combined with foam sclerotherapy in day surgery: a better choice for lower limb varicose veins. Lasers Med Sci. 2018; 33(7):1505-1511. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-2507-8. View

4.
Yilmaz S, Ceken K, Alparslan A, Durmaz S, Sindel T . Endovenous laser ablation and concomitant foam sclerotherapy: experience in 504 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011; 35(6):1403-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0329-1. View

5.
Adam D, Bello M, Hartshorne T, London N . Role of superficial venous surgery in patients with combined superficial and segmental deep venous reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 25(5):469-72. DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1894. View