» Articles » PMID: 31570500

Mating Yeast Cells Use an Intrinsic Polarity Site to Assemble a Pheromone-gradient Tracking Machine

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2019 Oct 2
PMID 31570500
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mating of budding yeast depends on chemotropism, a fundamental cellular process. The two yeast mating types secrete peptide pheromones that bind to GPCRs on cells of the opposite type. Cells find and contact a partner by determining the direction of the pheromone source and polarizing their growth toward it. Actin-directed secretion to the chemotropic growth site (CS) generates a mating projection. When pheromone-stimulated cells are unable to sense a gradient, they form mating projections where they would have budded in the next cell cycle, at a position called the default polarity site (DS). Numerous models have been proposed to explain yeast gradient sensing, but none address how cells reliably switch from the intrinsically determined DS to the gradient-aligned CS, despite a weak spatial signal. Here we demonstrate that, in mating cells, the initially uniform receptor and G protein first polarize to the DS, then redistribute along the plasma membrane until they reach the CS. Our data indicate that signaling, polarity, and trafficking proteins localize to the DS during assembly of what we call the gradient tracking machine (GTM). Differential activation of the receptor triggers feedback mechanisms that bias exocytosis upgradient and endocytosis downgradient, thus enabling redistribution of the GTM toward the pheromone source. The GTM stabilizes when the receptor peak centers at the CS and the endocytic machinery surrounds it. A computational model simulates GTM tracking and stabilization and correctly predicts that its assembly at a single site contributes to mating fidelity.

Citing Articles

The roles of yeast formins and their regulators Bud6 and Bil2 in the pheromone response.

Magliozzi J, Rands T, Shrestha S, Simke W, Hase N, Juanes M Mol Biol Cell. 2024; 35(6):ar85.

PMID: 38656798 PMC: 11238086. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E23-11-0459.


Particle-based simulations reveal two positive feedback loops allow relocation and stabilization of the polarity site during yeast mating.

Guan K, Curtis E, Lew D, Elston T PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(10):e1011523.

PMID: 37782676 PMC: 10569529. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011523.


Single-cell directional sensing from just a few receptor binding events.

Bernoff A, Jilkine A, Navarro Hernandez A, Lindsay A Biophys J. 2023; 122(15):3108-3116.

PMID: 37355773 PMC: 10432224. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.06.015.


Gradient tracking in mating yeast depends on Bud1 inactivation and actin-independent vesicle delivery.

Wang X, Pai C, Stone D J Cell Biol. 2022; 221(12).

PMID: 36156058 PMC: 9516845. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202203004.


Mechanism of commitment to a mating partner in .

Jacobs K, Gorman O, Lew D Mol Biol Cell. 2022; 33(12):ar112.

PMID: 35947501 PMC: 9635292. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E22-02-0043.


References
1.
Nern A, Arkowitz R . A GTP-exchange factor required for cell orientation. Nature. 1998; 391(6663):195-8. DOI: 10.1038/34458. View

2.
Lakhani V, Elston T . Testing the limits of gradient sensing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017; 13(2):e1005386. PMC: 5347372. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005386. View

3.
Suchkov D, DeFlorio R, Draper E, Ismael A, Sukumar M, Arkowitz R . Polarization of the yeast pheromone receptor requires its internalization but not actin-dependent secretion. Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21(10):1737-52. PMC: 2869379. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e09-08-0706. View

4.
Dixit G, Kelley J, Houser J, Elston T, Dohlman H . Cellular noise suppression by the regulator of G protein signaling Sst2. Mol Cell. 2014; 55(1):85-96. PMC: 4142594. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.019. View

5.
Hicke L, Zanolari B, Riezman H . Cytoplasmic tail phosphorylation of the alpha-factor receptor is required for its ubiquitination and internalization. J Cell Biol. 1998; 141(2):349-58. PMC: 2148449. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.141.2.349. View