» Articles » PMID: 31562637

Clear Skies Ahead: Optimizing the Learning Environment for Critical Thinking from A qualitative Analysis of Interviews with Expert Teachers

Overview
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2019 Sep 29
PMID 31562637
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The learning environment refers to the physical, pedagogical, and psychosocial contexts in which learning occurs and critically influences the educational experience of trainees in the health professions. However, the manner in which individual faculty explicitly organize the educational setting to facilitate learning of essential competencies such as critical thinking deserves more examination; lack of attention to this component can undermine the formal curriculum. The purpose of our study was to examine how faculty shape the learning environment to advance their learners' development of critical thinking.

Methods: We took a constructivist grounded theory approach using the framework method for qualitative content analysis. Data were derived from interviews conducted with 44 faculty identified as skilled teachers of critical thinking at eight academic health professions institutions.

Results: Three major themes emerged regarding participants' descriptions of their experiences of how they optimized the learning environment to support critical thinking: 1) Setting the atmosphere (establishing ground rules, focusing on process rather than answers, and building trust), 2) Maintaining the climate (gently pushing learners, tolerating discomfort, and adjusting to learner level), and 3) Weathering the storm (responses to challenges to learning critical thinking, including time and effort, negative evaluations, and resistance to effortful learning).

Discussion: An optimal learning environment for critical thinking was actively created by faculty to establish a safe environment and shared understanding of expectations. Understanding how to produce a conducive learning climate is paramount in teaching essential topics such as critical thinking. These findings have potential utility for faculty development initiatives to optimize the learning environment.

Citing Articles

Linking Learning Environment and Critical Thinking through Emotional Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Study of Health Sciences Students.

Christodoulakis A, Kritsotakis G, Gkorezis P, Sourtzi P, Tsiligianni I Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 36981483 PMC: 10048752. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060826.


Evaluating and comparing critical thinking skills of residents of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Mehrpour S, Shavoun A, Kheiltash A, Masoomi R, Nasle Seraji R BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):133.

PMID: 36849893 PMC: 9972640. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04094-7.


Tips for Building a Community for Incoming Medical Students Virtually in the COVID-19 Era.

Zheng M, Ruzgar N, Angoff N, Rosenthal D Med Sci Educ. 2021; 31(6):2033-2040.

PMID: 34754599 PMC: 8567972. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01447-z.


Effect of Concept Mapping Education on Critical Thinking Skills of Medical Students: A Quasi-experimental Study.

Maryam A, Mohammadreza D, Abdolhussein S, Ghobad R, Javad K Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021; 31(2):409-418.

PMID: 34158793 PMC: 8188091. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i2.24.


Development and Validation of a Theory-Informed Group Learning Environment Assessment Tool for Graduate Medical Education Programs.

Welch C, Carbajal M, Kumar S, Thammasitboon S J Grad Med Educ. 2020; 12(4):447-454.

PMID: 32879685 PMC: 7450759. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00748.1.

References
1.
Moutier C, Wingard D, Gudea M, Jeste D, Goodman S, Reznik V . The Culture of Academic Medicine: Faculty Behaviors Impacting the Learning Environment. Acad Psychiatry. 2016; 40(6):912-918. DOI: 10.1007/s40596-016-0582-3. View

2.
Shochet R, Colbert-Getz J, Wright S . The Johns Hopkins learning environment scale: measuring medical students' perceptions of the processes supporting professional formation. Acad Med. 2015; 90(6):810-8. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000706. View

3.
OSullivan P, Smith F . Addressing the National League for Nursing critical-thinking outcome. Nurse Educ. 1997; 22(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1097/00006223-199701000-00008. View

4.
Norris T, Schaad D, DeWitt D, Ogur B, Hunt D . Longitudinal integrated clerkships for medical students: an innovation adopted by medical schools in Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United States. Acad Med. 2009; 84(7):902-7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a85776. View

5.
Krupat E, Borges N, Brower R, Haidet P, Schroth W, Fleenor Jr T . The Educational Climate Inventory: Measuring Students' Perceptions of the Preclerkship and Clerkship Settings. Acad Med. 2017; 92(12):1757-1764. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001730. View