» Articles » PMID: 31561427

Characterization and Activity Analyses of the Promoter in

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Sep 29
PMID 31561427
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Flowering transition is a crucial development process in cotton ( L.), and the flowering time is closely correlated with the timing of () expression. However, the mechanism underlying the coordination of various -regulatory elements in the promoter of cotton has not been determined. In this study, a 5.9-kb promoter of was identified from cotton. A bioinformatics analysis showed that multiple insertion-deletion sites existed in the 5.9-kb promoter. Different expression levels of a reporter gene, and the induction by sequential deletions in promoter, demonstrated that 1.8-kb of the promoter was stronger than 4.2-, 4.8-, and 5.9-kb promoter fragments. The binding sites of the CONSTANS (CO) and NUCLEAR FACTOR Y transcription factors were located within the 1.0-kb sequence upstream of the transcription start site. A large number of repeat segments were identified in proximal promoter regions (-1.1 to -1.4 kb). A complementation analysis of deletion constructs between 1.0 and 1.8 kb of , , and promoters revealed that the 1.0-kb fragment significantly rescued the late-flowering phenotype of the loss-of-function mutant , whereas the 1.8-kb promoter only slightly rescued the late-flowering phenotype. Furthermore, the conserved CORE motif in the cotton promoter is an atypical TGTG(N2-3)ATG, but the number of arbitrary bases between TGTG and ATG is uncertain. Thus, the proximal promoter region might play an important role affecting the activity levels of promoters in cotton flowering.

Citing Articles

GhCOL2 Positively Regulates Flowering by Activating the Transcription of GhHD3A in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).

Yin X, Liu Y, Zhao H, Su Q, Zong J, Zhu X Biochem Genet. 2024; 63(1):298-314.

PMID: 38436815 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-024-10727-3.


A single amino acid change led to structural and functional differentiation of PvHd1 to control flowering in switchgrass.

Choi S, Prabhakar P, Chowdhury R, Pendergast T, Urbanowicz B, Maranas C J Exp Bot. 2023; 74(18):5532-5546.

PMID: 37402629 PMC: 10540729. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad255.


The Current Progresses in the Genes and Networks Regulating Cotton Plant Architecture.

Huang X, Liu H, Ma B Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:882583.

PMID: 35755647 PMC: 9218861. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.882583.


Identification and Functional Characterization of FLOWERING LOCUS T in .

Kim G, Rim Y, Cho H, Hyun T Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35161306 PMC: 8840131. DOI: 10.3390/plants11030325.


Roles of the 14-3-3 gene family in cotton flowering.

Sang N, Liu H, Ma B, Huang X, Zhuo L, Sun Y BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21(1):162.

PMID: 33789593 PMC: 8015177. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-02923-9.


References
1.
Frazer K, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin E, Dubchak I . VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(Web Server issue):W273-9. PMC: 441596. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh458. View

2.
Si Z, Liu H, Zhu J, Chen J, Wang Q, Fang L . Mutation of SELF-PRUNING homologs in cotton promotes short-branching plant architecture. J Exp Bot. 2018; 69(10):2543-2553. PMC: 5920339. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery093. View

3.
Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y . FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science. 2005; 309(5737):1052-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1115983. View

4.
Cao S, Kumimoto R, Gnesutta N, Calogero A, Mantovani R, Holt 3rd B . A distal CCAAT/NUCLEAR FACTOR Y complex promotes chromatin looping at the FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter and regulates the timing of flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014; 26(3):1009-17. PMC: 4001365. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.120352. View

5.
Guo D, Li C, Dong R, Li X, Xiao X, Huang X . Molecular cloning and functional analysis of the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) homolog GhFT1 from Gossypium hirsutum. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014; 57(6):522-33. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12316. View