» Articles » PMID: 31560132

Effect of Screw Channel Angulation on Reverse Torque Values of Dental Implant Abutment Screws

Overview
Journal J Prosthodont
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2019 Sep 28
PMID 31560132
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the reverse torque values (RTVs) of abutment screws tightened from three different angles.

Materials And Methods: Implant abutment screws (n = 48), abutments (3), and regular platform implant analogs (3) were divided into three angulation groups (n = 16/group). Custom guides of 0°, 10°, and 20° were fabricated to verify driver angulation. The implant components for each group were assembled and all screws torqued to 35 Ncm using a universal screwdriver in a manual torque wrench at the appropriate angle. Torque was reapplied 10 minutes after initial torque. A digital gauge was then used to measure reverse torque at a position parallel (0°) to the implant analog. RTVs were recorded and compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05).

Results: All mean RTVs fell below the targeted torque value of 35Ncm, with some values in each angulation group 10% below of the target value. Mean RTVs in descending order from targeted torque value were: 10° group = 32.07 ± 0.97 Ncm, 0° group = 31.16 ± 1.12 Ncm, and 20° group = 30.08 ± 0.88 Ncm. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between angulation groups (F = 15.954, p < 0.001). Tukey HSD post hoc comparisons revealed that the mean RTVs of the three angulation groups were significantly different from each other (0° vs. 10°: p = 0.033; 0° vs. 20°: p = 0.011; 10° vs. 20°: p < 0.001).

Conclusions: All RTVs did not reach the targeted torque value of 35 Ncm. Mean screw RTVs were significantly influenced by screwdriver insertion angulation.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Aesthetic, Mechanical Outcome, and Bone Loss in Angulated Screw Channels (ASCs) and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prosthesis: A Case-Control Study.

Rella E, De Angelis P, Papetti L, Damis G, Gasparini G, DAddona A Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195077 PMC: 11353712. DOI: 10.3390/dj12080233.


The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review.

Albakri A Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(8):1072-1077.

PMID: 39176153 PMC: 11337959. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002.


Influence of screw channel angulation on reverse torque value and fracture resistance in monolithic zirconia restorations after thermomechanical cycling: an in-vitro study.

Khaledi A, Shalileh S, Hejazi M, Giti R BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):389.

PMID: 38532413 PMC: 11289999. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04171-3.


Comparative evaluation of biological, mechanical, and patient-reported outcomes of angulated screw channel abutments versus multi-unit abutment-retained single-unit implant restorations in the anterior esthetic zone: An- study.

Varshney N, Kusum C, Trivedi A, Kaushik M, Dubey P, Bali Y J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023; 23(3):244-252.

PMID: 37929363 PMC: 10467320. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_101_23.


Reverse Torque Value of Angulated Screw Channel Abutment before and after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Study.

Chen Y, Wu Y, Chen H, Lin C, Wu A J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(3).

PMID: 36976048 PMC: 10051685. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14030124.