» Articles » PMID: 31557867

Identifying Individual Stressors in Geriatric Nursing Staff-A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Sep 28
PMID 31557867
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nurses in geriatric care are exposed to various burdens in the workplace that result in high stress levels. The perceived stress may result in a lack of professional caring and burnout. The study aim was to identify work-related and personal factors that determine stress levels to design tailored interventions. cross-sectional study. = 195 geriatric nursing staff members. The survey included validated questionnaires (Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress (TICS), Health Survey Short form 12 (SF-12), Nordic Questionnaire) to identify work-related burdens, resulting stress levels and work-related behavior (AVEM). According to the limits of the Screening Subscale for chronic stress (SSCS) of the TICS, nurses were classified as stressed or non-stressed. With four-step regression analysis, main predictors for the stress level were identified. The analysis revealed body postures, handling heavy loads, time pressure, deadlines and pressure to perform as the main burdens of the participants. Chronically stressed nurses showed different work patterns in comparison to nurses with lower stress levels. The regression analysis showed significance for the models including the work-related patterns and resilience aspects (step three (F (3.42) = 4.168; = 0.010) and four (F (7.35) = 4.194; = 0.002). Pattern B was a main factor for determining stress. The stress level determined the perceived burdens. Experiencing and managing stressors depends on the individual's perception, while coping patterns-especially pattern B-can be decisive. The tailored interventions to reduce stress in geriatric nurses should focus on personal patterns.

Citing Articles

Perceived HRM and turnover intentions of elderly care workers: perspective from person-job fit and institutional ownership.

Wu F, Chen W, Wan R, Lu J, Yu Q, Tu Q BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):242.

PMID: 38622615 PMC: 11020918. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01926-9.


The Predominance of the Health-Promoting Patterns of Work Behavior and Experience in General Practice Teams-Results of the IMPROVE Study.

Thielmann B, Wagner A, Bozorgmehr A, Rind E, Siegel A, Hippler M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38338184 PMC: 10855740. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030299.


The role of self-endangering cognitions between long-term care nurses' altruistic job motives and exhaustion.

Eder L, Meyer B Front Health Serv. 2023; 3:1100225.

PMID: 37681220 PMC: 10482104. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1100225.


Working nurses' empathy with patients in public hospitals.

Ponton Y, Narvaez V, Andrade B, Teran J, Reyes-Reyes A, Calzadilla-Nunez A Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023; 31:e3968.

PMID: 37556616 PMC: 10408249. DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.6591.3968.


Chronic stress and coping mechanisms among nurses in Lango sub-region, northern Uganda.

Kabunga A, Kigongo E, Udho S, Auma A, Okalo P, Apili B Nurs Open. 2023; 10(9):6101-6107.

PMID: 37199048 PMC: 10415976. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1831.


References
1.
Pelissier C, Vohito M, Fort E, Sellier B, Agard J, Fontana L . Risk factors for work-related stress and subjective hardship in health-care staff in nursing homes for the elderly: A cross-sectional study. J Occup Health. 2015; 57(3):285-96. DOI: 10.1539/joh.14-0090-OA. View

2.
Eatough E, Way J, Chang C . Understanding the link between psychosocial work stressors and work-related musculoskeletal complaints. Appl Ergon. 2011; 43(3):554-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.009. View

3.
Dackert I . The impact of team climate for innovation on well-being and stress in elderly care. J Nurs Manag. 2010; 18(3):302-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01079.x. View

4.
Nubling M, Vomstein M, Schmidt S, Gregersen S, Dulon M, Nienhaus A . Psychosocial work load and stress in the geriatric care. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:428. PMC: 2916905. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-428. View

5.
McVicar A . Workplace stress in nursing: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 44(6):633-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02853.x. View