» Articles » PMID: 31552911

DNA Sequencing of Cytopathologically Inconclusive EUS-FNA from Solid Pancreatic Lesions Suspicious for Malignancy Confirms EUS Diagnosis

Overview
Date 2019 Sep 26
PMID 31552911
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: EUS-FNA is inconclusive in up to 10%-15% of patients with solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). We aimed to investigate whether supplementary genetic analyses with whole-exome sequencing add diagnostic value in patients with SPLs suspicious of malignancy but inconclusive EUS-FNA.

Patients And Methods: Thirty-nine patients, who underwent EUS-FNA of an SPL were retrospectively included. Three groups were defined: 16 (41.0%) had suspected malignancy on EUS confirmed by cytology (malignant), 13 (33.3%) had suspected malignancy on EUS but benign cytology (inconclusive), and 10 (25.6%) had benign EUS imaging and cytology (benign). Areas with the highest epithelial cell concentrations were macro-dissected from the FNA smears from each patient, and extracted DNA was used for whole-exome sequencing by next-generation sequencing of a selected gene panel including 19 genes commonly mutated in cancer.

Results: Pathogenic mutations in K-RAS, TP53, and PIK3CA differed significantly between the three groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.018, and P = 0.026, respectively). Pathogenic mutations in KRAS and TP53 were predominant in the inconclusive (54% and 31%, respectively) and malignant groups (81.3% and 50%, respectively) compared to the benign group (0%). Malignant and inconclusive diagnoses correlated strongly with poor overall survival (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Whole-exome sequencing of genes commonly mutated in pancreatic cancer may be an important adjunct in patients with SPLs suspicious for malignancy on EUS but with uncertain cytological diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Adequacy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy for next-generation sequencing in pancreatic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pan Y, Ran T, Zhang X, Qin X, Zhang Y, Zhou C Endosc Ultrasound. 2025; 13(6):366-375.

PMID: 39802109 PMC: 11723693. DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000097.


Next-Generation Sequencing: An Advanced Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Pancreatic Disease/Disorder.

Biswas S, Afrose S, Mita M, Hasan M, Shimu M, Zaman S JGH Open. 2024; 8(11):e70061.

PMID: 39605899 PMC: 11599877. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.70061.


Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review.

Yang X, Liu Z, Zhou X, Yang F, Ma W, Sun X World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(3):117-125.

PMID: 38577648 PMC: 10989249. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.117.


Impact of Smad4 and p53 mutations on the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing chemotherapy.

Kamata K, Takenaka M, Nishida N, Hara A, Otsuka Y, Tanaka H Int J Clin Oncol. 2023; 28(11):1511-1519.

PMID: 37596505 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02396-w.


Effect of wet-heparinized suction on the quality of mediastinal solid tumor specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a retrospective study from a single center.

Xu B, Lu Q, Fang R, Dai X, Xu H, Ding X BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):208.

PMID: 37316772 PMC: 10268349. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02845-w.


References
1.
Lohr M, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels A . K-Ras mutations and benign pancreatic disease. Int J Pancreatol. 2000; 27(2):93-103. DOI: 10.1385/IJGC:27:2:093. View

2.
Rihani A, De Wilde B, Zeka F, Laureys G, Francotte N, Tonini G . CASP8 SNP D302H (rs1045485) is associated with worse survival in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma patients. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114696. PMC: 4263607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114696. View

3.
Eloubeidi M, Decker G, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi K, Early D, Evans J . The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 83(1):17-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.009. View

4.
Macgregor-Das A, Iacobuzio-Donahue C . Molecular pathways in pancreatic carcinogenesis. J Surg Oncol. 2012; 107(1):8-14. PMC: 3661191. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23213. View

5.
Trisolini E, Armellini E, Paganotti A, Veggiani C, Bozzola C, Frattini M . KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy. Pathology. 2017; 49(4):379-386. DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.12.348. View