» Articles » PMID: 31550287

Tuberculosis in the Wild Boar: Frequentist and Bayesian Estimations of Diagnostic Test Parameters when Mycobacterium Bovis is Present in Wild Boars but at Low Prevalence

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Sep 25
PMID 31550287
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) is increasingly considered as a relevant actor in the epidemiology of animal tuberculosis (TB). Therefore, monitoring TB in this species is key when establishing comprehensive control schemes for this disease still present in Europe. No data are available on direct and indirect TB diagnostic methods in wild boars in epidemiological contexts where TB is endemic in cattle and detected in wild boars at low prevalence. We aimed to estimate and compare sensitivity and specificity values for bacterial culture, PCR and three commercial ELISAs, i.e. the TB ELISA-VK (using the bPPD antigen), INgezim TB Porcine and IDEXX M. bovis Ab Test (both using the MPB83 and MPB70 antigens), under field conditions in France. We used frequentist methods, with bacteriology as the gold standard, and a Bayesian formulation of the latent class analysis (LCA), without using a gold standard. Submandibular lymph nodes and sera from 495 wild boars hunter-harvested in three endemic areas (Aquitaine region, Côte d'Or region, and Corsica region) were collected between 2014 and 2016. Only eight individuals were positive for M. bovis by bacteriology (1.61%; CI95% 0.70-3.51%). The LCA method provided high specificities (99.2%; CI95% 98.2-99.8% for INgezim TB Porcine and 99.7%; CI95% 98.8-100% for IDEXX M. bovis Ab Test) and sensitivities (78.5%; CI95% 65.1-88.8% for INgezim TB Porcine and 83.9%; CI95% 58.9-97.2% for IDEXX M. bovis Ab Test) for both ELISAs using the MPB83 and MPB70 antigens. Bacterial culture showed limited sensitivity (42.8%; CI95% 19.0-70.6%), estimated as the probability of a positive result in an animal exposed to M. bovis. PCR and ELISA using the bPPD antigens demonstrated high specificities, and sensitivities intermediates between culture and the ELISAs using the MPB83 and MPB70 antigens. These results suggest that ELISA tests using the MPB83 and MPB70 antigens are useful to detect and monitor TB exposure of wild boar populations in field conditions in France.

Citing Articles

An Overview of a Re-Emerging Disease in Italy: Bovine Tuberculosis Outbreaks in Cattle from MTBC-Free Territories.

Giusti A, Carbonetta L, Fratini F, Spatola G, Panerai F, Pardini S Pathogens. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39599515 PMC: 11597750. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13110962.


Performance of post-mortem diagnostic tests for tuberculosis in wild ungulates at low and high prevalence assessed using Bayesian latent class models.

Cardoso B, Jimenez-Ruiz S, Perello Jimenez A, Novoa M, Santos J, Correia-Neves M Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1415277.

PMID: 39386245 PMC: 11461446. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1415277.


Presence of Foodborne Bacteria in Wild Boar and Wild Boar Meat-A Literature Survey for the Period 2012-2022.

Altissimi C, Noe-Nordberg C, Ranucci D, Paulsen P Foods. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37107481 PMC: 10137515. DOI: 10.3390/foods12081689.


An outbreak of tuberculosis in endangered northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina) and milu deer (Elaphurus davidianus) from a zoo in China.

Chen Y, Yan Y, Gao Y, Li Y, Zhang K, Zhou M Vet Med Sci. 2023; 9(2):992-998.

PMID: 36626281 PMC: 10029874. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.1014.


Infection in Wild Boar (): Histopathology Analysis Suggests Containment of the Infection.

Pigoli C, Tranquillo V, Gibelli L, Gaffuri A, Alborali G, Pacciarini M Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:734919.

PMID: 34589536 PMC: 8473807. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.734919.


References
1.
Boadella M, Lyashchenko K, Greenwald R, Esfandiari J, Jaroso R, Carta T . Serologic tests for detecting antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa). J Vet Diagn Invest. 2011; 23(1):77-83. DOI: 10.1177/104063871102300111. View

2.
Cano-Terriza D, Risalde M, Rodriguez-Hernandez P, Napp S, Fernandez-Morente M, Moreno I . Epidemiological surveillance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in extensively raised pigs in the south of Spain. Prev Vet Med. 2018; 159:87-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.08.015. View

3.
Hines N, Payeur J, Hoffman L . Comparison of the recovery of Mycobacterium bovis isolates using the BACTEC MGIT 960 system, BACTEC 460 system, and Middlebrook 7H10 and 7H11 solid media. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2006; 18(3):243-50. DOI: 10.1177/104063870601800302. View

4.
Corner L, Gormley E, Pfeiffer D . Primary isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from bovine tissues: conditions for maximising the number of positive cultures. Vet Microbiol. 2011; 156(1-2):162-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.016. View

5.
Aranaz A, de Juan L, Montero N, Sanchez C, Galka M, Delso C . Bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in wildlife in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(6):2602-8. PMC: 427808. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2602-2608.2004. View